Explore related documents that you might be interested in.
Going to school is critical for our childrenâs futures. The evidence is clear that every day of school matters, missing school leads to lower achievement. In New Zealand, learners are expected to attend school every day the school is open. And yet many donât. New Zealand has lower attendance than other countries and alarmingly attendance is falling.
To understand what is happening to attendance in New Zealand, the Education Review Office (ERO) looked at parentsâ and learnersâ attitudes, choices, and experiences. This report describes what we found and what is needed to improve attendance.
Attendance is when learners are at school and in the class they are supposed to be at. If learners miss a week or more of school in a term, they have ânon-regular attendanceâ. Learners who miss a week each term will have missed out on more than a year of schooling by the time they are 16.
Covid-19 has badly disrupted attendance, but even before the pandemic Aotearoa New Zealand had lower attendance than other countries. Â And alarmingly attendance is falling â between 2015 and 2019, there was a 12 percentage point decrease in learners who were going to school regularly..
Declining attendance is seen across all school types and for all ethnicities. The drop has been steepest in low-decile schools, and for MÄori and Pacific learners. The biggest change has been the increase in learners who no longer go to school regularly but do go to school often (80 to 90 percent of the time). This study looks at why.
This study looked at the views that parents and learners have about education, and about attending school across Aotearoa New Zealand, in English-medium schools.
Understanding the importance of attendance is critical. We found that:
Parents told us they thought regular attendance was less important in primary school, but this is not the case. Primary school provides foundation learning and missing school in primary school is linked with poor attendance in secondary school. Â
School needs to be a priority if we are to reverse the decline in attendance. We found that parents often prioritise other things:
Parents of primary aged learners or from rural areas are more likely to support missing school to go on a holiday. MÄori (81 percent) and Pacific (71 percent) parents are more likely to keep their child out of school to attended family cultural events.Â
Learners also miss school due to other priorities. Learners said they want to miss school because they:
To shift attendance, we need to understand and overcome barriers to going to school. The study was during the peak of the Omicron outbreak, so illness and injury was by far the most common barrier to school attendance identified by parents and learners. Seventy-six percent of parents said they had kept their child home in the past term for illness or injury.
We also found that:
Learners face barriers to school attendance:
To improve attendance we need to understand the different barriers learners face.
MÄori and Pacific parents are more likely to keep their child out of school due to bullying, illness, and mental health challenges.
Older learners (year 11-13) are less engaged in school and more likely to want to miss school because they arenât interested in what is taught.
Learners in low decile schools are more likely to think it was important to go to school every day. However, parents of learners in low decile schools face more challenges with transport or their children not having all the equipment/resources they need to go to school. While learners in high decile schools have higher attendance, they are less motivated to go to school if they have more enjoyable things to do at home.
Disabled learners have multiple barriers to attendance and stay at home more because they canât participate in an activity, donât have the support or equipment to participate, have physical and mental health challenges, are bullied, and face challenges with transport.
By understanding what motivates learners to go to school we can be more effective in raising attendance. The top motivators that make learners want to go to school are:
We need to tailor our approaches to different learners. We found that:
Learners who told us they had regular attendance are more motivated to go to school because they liked or were interested in what was being taught and could see how school was relevant to their future. Learners who told us they had non-regular attendance are more motivated to go to school because they would get into trouble if they didnât go.Â
Schools cannot improve attendance alone. Urgent action is needed by government, communities, schools, families, and learners to turn around Aotearoa New Zealandâs falling attendance levels. Action is already underway with the Ministry of Educationâs Attendance and Engagement strategy, All in for learning |Kia Kotahi te ĹŤ ki te ako. Many schools we talked to had also put in place targeted initiatives to raise attendance.
Schools, parents, and learners told us what they thought would help improve attendance. We are recommending action in five key areas.
Going to school is critical for our childrenâs futures. The evidence is clear that every day of school matters, missing school leads to lower achievement. In New Zealand, learners are expected to attend school every day the school is open. And yet many donât. New Zealand has lower attendance than other countries and alarmingly attendance is falling.
To understand what is happening to attendance in New Zealand, the Education Review Office (ERO) looked at parentsâ and learnersâ attitudes, choices, and experiences. This report describes what we found and what is needed to improve attendance.
Attendance is when learners are at school and in the class they are supposed to be at. If learners miss a week or more of school in a term, they have ânon-regular attendanceâ. Learners who miss a week each term will have missed out on more than a year of schooling by the time they are 16.
Covid-19 has badly disrupted attendance, but even before the pandemic Aotearoa New Zealand had lower attendance than other countries. Â And alarmingly attendance is falling â between 2015 and 2019, there was a 12 percentage point decrease in learners who were going to school regularly..
Declining attendance is seen across all school types and for all ethnicities. The drop has been steepest in low-decile schools, and for MÄori and Pacific learners. The biggest change has been the increase in learners who no longer go to school regularly but do go to school often (80 to 90 percent of the time). This study looks at why.
This study looked at the views that parents and learners have about education, and about attending school across Aotearoa New Zealand, in English-medium schools.
Understanding the importance of attendance is critical. We found that:
Parents told us they thought regular attendance was less important in primary school, but this is not the case. Primary school provides foundation learning and missing school in primary school is linked with poor attendance in secondary school. Â
School needs to be a priority if we are to reverse the decline in attendance. We found that parents often prioritise other things:
Parents of primary aged learners or from rural areas are more likely to support missing school to go on a holiday. MÄori (81 percent) and Pacific (71 percent) parents are more likely to keep their child out of school to attended family cultural events.Â
Learners also miss school due to other priorities. Learners said they want to miss school because they:
To shift attendance, we need to understand and overcome barriers to going to school. The study was during the peak of the Omicron outbreak, so illness and injury was by far the most common barrier to school attendance identified by parents and learners. Seventy-six percent of parents said they had kept their child home in the past term for illness or injury.
We also found that:
Learners face barriers to school attendance:
To improve attendance we need to understand the different barriers learners face.
MÄori and Pacific parents are more likely to keep their child out of school due to bullying, illness, and mental health challenges.
Older learners (year 11-13) are less engaged in school and more likely to want to miss school because they arenât interested in what is taught.
Learners in low decile schools are more likely to think it was important to go to school every day. However, parents of learners in low decile schools face more challenges with transport or their children not having all the equipment/resources they need to go to school. While learners in high decile schools have higher attendance, they are less motivated to go to school if they have more enjoyable things to do at home.
Disabled learners have multiple barriers to attendance and stay at home more because they canât participate in an activity, donât have the support or equipment to participate, have physical and mental health challenges, are bullied, and face challenges with transport.
By understanding what motivates learners to go to school we can be more effective in raising attendance. The top motivators that make learners want to go to school are:
We need to tailor our approaches to different learners. We found that:
Learners who told us they had regular attendance are more motivated to go to school because they liked or were interested in what was being taught and could see how school was relevant to their future. Learners who told us they had non-regular attendance are more motivated to go to school because they would get into trouble if they didnât go.Â
Schools cannot improve attendance alone. Urgent action is needed by government, communities, schools, families, and learners to turn around Aotearoa New Zealandâs falling attendance levels. Action is already underway with the Ministry of Educationâs Attendance and Engagement strategy, All in for learning |Kia Kotahi te ĹŤ ki te ako. Many schools we talked to had also put in place targeted initiatives to raise attendance.
Schools, parents, and learners told us what they thought would help improve attendance. We are recommending action in five key areas.
Attendance at Aotearoa New Zealand schools has been declining across all demographic groups for several years. This report looks at what is driving the decline in attendance by talking to parents and learners about why learners miss school and why learners go to school. It also suggests how attendance can be improved.
This report looks at the views that parents and learners have about school and about attending school across Aotearoa New Zealand, in English-medium schools. It includes strategies to improve regular attendance.
We looked at the drivers of non-attendance of learners who often attend school, but donât go all the time. We did not look at the drivers of non-attendance of learners who rarely go to school. We asked:
ERO collected a wide range of data to understand the attitudes and perceptions held by parents and learners about school and school attendance. ERO spoke to learners, parents, teachers, and school leaders to understand what might be contributing to the decline in attendance we are seeing, and to provide ideas for improving attendance.
The data ERO collected included:
Surveys samples were as representative as possible, however the students sample differed from the population on some demographics. Further details on our data collection and analysis are given in Appendix 1.
This report sets out what we have found about why learners are and are not going to school in Aotearoa New Zealand.
There are short vignettes (in green boxes) throughout the report which highlight specific experiences of respondents, or actions undertaken by schools.
ERO is very grateful for the time of all those who we spoke to while researching for this report. We would like to thank all the learners, parents and whÄnau, teachers, and principals for generously sharing their experiences around school attendance. Â
We would also like to thank our Expert Advisory Group: Professor Melinda Webber and Dr Mohamed Alansari, who shared their knowledge and wisdom.Â
Attendance at Aotearoa New Zealand schools has been declining across all demographic groups for several years. This report looks at what is driving the decline in attendance by talking to parents and learners about why learners miss school and why learners go to school. It also suggests how attendance can be improved.
This report looks at the views that parents and learners have about school and about attending school across Aotearoa New Zealand, in English-medium schools. It includes strategies to improve regular attendance.
We looked at the drivers of non-attendance of learners who often attend school, but donât go all the time. We did not look at the drivers of non-attendance of learners who rarely go to school. We asked:
ERO collected a wide range of data to understand the attitudes and perceptions held by parents and learners about school and school attendance. ERO spoke to learners, parents, teachers, and school leaders to understand what might be contributing to the decline in attendance we are seeing, and to provide ideas for improving attendance.
The data ERO collected included:
Surveys samples were as representative as possible, however the students sample differed from the population on some demographics. Further details on our data collection and analysis are given in Appendix 1.
This report sets out what we have found about why learners are and are not going to school in Aotearoa New Zealand.
There are short vignettes (in green boxes) throughout the report which highlight specific experiences of respondents, or actions undertaken by schools.
ERO is very grateful for the time of all those who we spoke to while researching for this report. We would like to thank all the learners, parents and whÄnau, teachers, and principals for generously sharing their experiences around school attendance. Â
We would also like to thank our Expert Advisory Group: Professor Melinda Webber and Dr Mohamed Alansari, who shared their knowledge and wisdom.Â
School attendance is a key priority as attendance at school is critical for achievement, wellbeing, and other lifelong outcomes.
The more days of school a learner misses, the greater the impact on their learning. Establishing healthy attendance patterns early in schooling helps learners carry through attendance habits into future schooling. Missing school for justified reasons is less harmful than missing school for unjustified reasons, but there is no safe level of non-attendance. Every day matters.
This section outlines:
Attending school is learners being in the classroom when they are expected to be there. In Aotearoa New Zealand, the expectation is that learners will attend every day that a school is open and that schools will take all reasonable steps to ensure they do.1
There are different types of absences from school. Absences are justified if the reason a learner is not at school is an acceptable reason for the learner to be away from school. An example of a justified absence would be a short-term illness. Unjustified absences are those that are either unexplained or are an unacceptable reason. An example of an unjustified absence could be a holiday during term time.2
Regular attendance in Aotearoa New Zealand is defined as missing less than a week (less than 10 half days, or five full days) in a term. Learners who miss a week each term will have missed out on a year of schooling by the time they are 16.
Attendance is a key driver of learnersâ achievement and wellbeing, and their lifelong outcomes.3,4,5
National and international evidence shows that attendance is directly related to how well learners achieve, both in primary and secondary schools.6,7,8,9Â The more learners attend, the higher their achievement, and the more NCEA credits they gain.10,11
As the graph below shows, there is no safe level of non-attendance â even missing just two days a term is linked to lower achievement. Missing school leads to lost opportunities to learn that impacts on achievement, even if learners have good engagement.12
For learners in lower decile schools, non-attendance is linked to a loss of learning and a greater risk of not achieving national qualifications.13,14
Worryingly, the impact of missing school builds over time as learners fall further behind their peers.15Â Irregular attendance has long-lasting effects on later attainment.
Figure 1: Overall relationship between attendance rate and attainment (NCEA Level 1 credits)
Source: Ministry of Education
Going to school is important for learnersâ wellbeing.16
More days of non-attendance is associated with worse wellbeing outcomes, including schoolwork-related anxiety, decreased sense of belonging, fewer friendships with peers, exposure to bullying, and feeling like your teachers is being unfair.17Â The relationship between non-attendance and wellbeing works both ways - poor wellbeing leads to poor attendance, and poor attendance leads to poor wellbeing.
Poor attendance increases the risk of poor achievement, which has lifelong negative impacts including lower earnings and employment sustainability.18Â International research19Â has also linked lower school attendance to:
Establishing regular attendance routines early in childrenâs schooling is important. How often learners attend in early primary school predicts how much they will attend in secondary school. Non-attendance in early education often continues in later years.20,21,22
Primary school also lays the foundations for future learning and develops the skills that are important for being successful in secondary school. Missing school in primary school can create gaps in learning that set learners back in secondary school and contribute to increasing disengagement from school and learning.23
How much school is missed matters, but so does the type of absence. Unjustified absences, those absences not agreed with the school, are linked to larger losses in learning than justified absences.24,25
Attendance is critically important for learners to thrive in education. It impacts on how well they achieve and also on their future outcomes. This is why the low and declining attendance rates in Aotearoa New Zealand are so concerning. The next section of this report sets out how attendance in Aotearoa New Zealand compares to other countries, and the nature and size of the decline.
School attendance is a key priority as attendance at school is critical for achievement, wellbeing, and other lifelong outcomes.
The more days of school a learner misses, the greater the impact on their learning. Establishing healthy attendance patterns early in schooling helps learners carry through attendance habits into future schooling. Missing school for justified reasons is less harmful than missing school for unjustified reasons, but there is no safe level of non-attendance. Every day matters.
This section outlines:
Attending school is learners being in the classroom when they are expected to be there. In Aotearoa New Zealand, the expectation is that learners will attend every day that a school is open and that schools will take all reasonable steps to ensure they do.1
There are different types of absences from school. Absences are justified if the reason a learner is not at school is an acceptable reason for the learner to be away from school. An example of a justified absence would be a short-term illness. Unjustified absences are those that are either unexplained or are an unacceptable reason. An example of an unjustified absence could be a holiday during term time.2
Regular attendance in Aotearoa New Zealand is defined as missing less than a week (less than 10 half days, or five full days) in a term. Learners who miss a week each term will have missed out on a year of schooling by the time they are 16.
Attendance is a key driver of learnersâ achievement and wellbeing, and their lifelong outcomes.3,4,5
National and international evidence shows that attendance is directly related to how well learners achieve, both in primary and secondary schools.6,7,8,9Â The more learners attend, the higher their achievement, and the more NCEA credits they gain.10,11
As the graph below shows, there is no safe level of non-attendance â even missing just two days a term is linked to lower achievement. Missing school leads to lost opportunities to learn that impacts on achievement, even if learners have good engagement.12
For learners in lower decile schools, non-attendance is linked to a loss of learning and a greater risk of not achieving national qualifications.13,14
Worryingly, the impact of missing school builds over time as learners fall further behind their peers.15Â Irregular attendance has long-lasting effects on later attainment.
Figure 1: Overall relationship between attendance rate and attainment (NCEA Level 1 credits)
Source: Ministry of Education
Going to school is important for learnersâ wellbeing.16
More days of non-attendance is associated with worse wellbeing outcomes, including schoolwork-related anxiety, decreased sense of belonging, fewer friendships with peers, exposure to bullying, and feeling like your teachers is being unfair.17Â The relationship between non-attendance and wellbeing works both ways - poor wellbeing leads to poor attendance, and poor attendance leads to poor wellbeing.
Poor attendance increases the risk of poor achievement, which has lifelong negative impacts including lower earnings and employment sustainability.18Â International research19Â has also linked lower school attendance to:
Establishing regular attendance routines early in childrenâs schooling is important. How often learners attend in early primary school predicts how much they will attend in secondary school. Non-attendance in early education often continues in later years.20,21,22
Primary school also lays the foundations for future learning and develops the skills that are important for being successful in secondary school. Missing school in primary school can create gaps in learning that set learners back in secondary school and contribute to increasing disengagement from school and learning.23
How much school is missed matters, but so does the type of absence. Unjustified absences, those absences not agreed with the school, are linked to larger losses in learning than justified absences.24,25
Attendance is critically important for learners to thrive in education. It impacts on how well they achieve and also on their future outcomes. This is why the low and declining attendance rates in Aotearoa New Zealand are so concerning. The next section of this report sets out how attendance in Aotearoa New Zealand compares to other countries, and the nature and size of the decline.
Learner, family, school, community, and economic factors all impact on attendance. Understanding how these factors combine and interact is critical to understanding what drives attendance and how best to work with learners, whÄnau, and communities to improve attendance rates.
This section briefly sets out the range of factors that impact on school attendance.
We have seen that attendance in Aotearoa New Zealand is declining. To understand why, we looked at what international and national evidence says impacts learner attendance at school.29,30,31,32Â Attendance and non-attendance are influenced by:
Learner factors that impact on attendance or non-attendance include:
For example, in Aotearoa New Zealand, learners with emotional and behavioural challenges were found to be up to seven times more likely to have unjustified absences from school than those with low to moderate challenges. Emotional and behavioural challenges in a school are more closely associated with truancy levels than school type, size, and decile.33
Aotearoa New Zealandâs high rates of mental illness in young people may impact on attendance. Aotearoa New Zealand has a high and rising rate of mental health issues amongst young people. Our male youth suicide rate was the third highest and female youth suicide rate was the highest in the OECD.Â
There are also family factors that impact on attendance, including:
In Aotearoa New Zealand, research34Â has found that family function (including disadvantage, dysfunction, or conflictual home environments) is the strongest predictor of later school truancy.Â
Falling attendance may also reflect families struggling to manage:
About 11 percent of Aotearoa New Zealand families experience material hardship. While the proportion of families with children experiencing material hardship in Aotearoa New Zealand has been steadily trending down since 2013,38Â single parent families, families with three or more children, MÄori, and Pacific families still disproportionately experience material hardship.39
The school and the environment of the school both impact on attendance, including:
A schoolâs climate, whether learners get on well, has been found to have the greatest impact on attendance.40
The degree to which teaching responds to individual needs of learners is also identified as an important school factor.41,42
Racism in the education sector has a negative impact on engagement (including attendance) wellbeing, and achievement of MÄori and Pacific learners.43,44,45,46,47,48,49
Finally, bullying is a serious issue in Aotearoa New Zealand schools. In 2019, ERO found that 46 percent of primary-age students and 31 percent of secondary-age students reported having been bullied at their current school.50Â Aotearoa New Zealand has one of the highest rates of bullying in the OECD.51,52
The community can also impact on learner attendance. Community barriers, include:
There are also other community cultural activities and responsibilities that can take priority over going to school, for example attending local marae, tangihanga/funerals, and going to church.
Economic factors that may impact on attendance include:
The drivers of attendance are complex. Learner attendance on any given day of school will result from the combination of any number of these factors. In the next section of this report, we will set out what learners and parents told us about reasons for missing school.
Learner, family, school, community, and economic factors all impact on attendance. Understanding how these factors combine and interact is critical to understanding what drives attendance and how best to work with learners, whÄnau, and communities to improve attendance rates.
This section briefly sets out the range of factors that impact on school attendance.
We have seen that attendance in Aotearoa New Zealand is declining. To understand why, we looked at what international and national evidence says impacts learner attendance at school.29,30,31,32Â Attendance and non-attendance are influenced by:
Learner factors that impact on attendance or non-attendance include:
For example, in Aotearoa New Zealand, learners with emotional and behavioural challenges were found to be up to seven times more likely to have unjustified absences from school than those with low to moderate challenges. Emotional and behavioural challenges in a school are more closely associated with truancy levels than school type, size, and decile.33
Aotearoa New Zealandâs high rates of mental illness in young people may impact on attendance. Aotearoa New Zealand has a high and rising rate of mental health issues amongst young people. Our male youth suicide rate was the third highest and female youth suicide rate was the highest in the OECD.Â
There are also family factors that impact on attendance, including:
In Aotearoa New Zealand, research34Â has found that family function (including disadvantage, dysfunction, or conflictual home environments) is the strongest predictor of later school truancy.Â
Falling attendance may also reflect families struggling to manage:
About 11 percent of Aotearoa New Zealand families experience material hardship. While the proportion of families with children experiencing material hardship in Aotearoa New Zealand has been steadily trending down since 2013,38Â single parent families, families with three or more children, MÄori, and Pacific families still disproportionately experience material hardship.39
The school and the environment of the school both impact on attendance, including:
A schoolâs climate, whether learners get on well, has been found to have the greatest impact on attendance.40
The degree to which teaching responds to individual needs of learners is also identified as an important school factor.41,42
Racism in the education sector has a negative impact on engagement (including attendance) wellbeing, and achievement of MÄori and Pacific learners.43,44,45,46,47,48,49
Finally, bullying is a serious issue in Aotearoa New Zealand schools. In 2019, ERO found that 46 percent of primary-age students and 31 percent of secondary-age students reported having been bullied at their current school.50Â Aotearoa New Zealand has one of the highest rates of bullying in the OECD.51,52
The community can also impact on learner attendance. Community barriers, include:
There are also other community cultural activities and responsibilities that can take priority over going to school, for example attending local marae, tangihanga/funerals, and going to church.
Economic factors that may impact on attendance include:
The drivers of attendance are complex. Learner attendance on any given day of school will result from the combination of any number of these factors. In the next section of this report, we will set out what learners and parents told us about reasons for missing school.
Understanding when and why learners are not going to school will help raise attendance.
We found many reasons why learners are missing school. Concerningly, some parents and learners told us that they do not see school as that important.
Many parents and learners, while valuing schooling and attendance, still prioritise other activities over attendance. There are also barriers to attendance.
We have seen that attendance in Aotearoa New Zealand is declining and a range of learner, family, community, and economic factors can impact on attendance. This section of the report outlines the range of factors we found that impacted on attendance.
Achievement at school leads to positive lifelong outcomes. This section reports on:
While most parents do value school and think it is important for their child, 8 percent of parents reported that school was only somewhat important, not that important, or not important at all for their childâs future.
Figure 9: Extent to which parents think school is important for their childâs future
In focus groups, we heard a similar story. Most parents indicated they felt school was important for their child, but there was still a small number of parents who indicated school was not as important to them. Parents who didnât value school as highly had a variety of reasons for doing so.
âFor our eldest â not so much â sheâs not going to be a doctor or lawyer â she is a sports person. Her attendance is shocking because she is travelling so much.ââ - Parent of secondary learner
We found an even larger proportion of learners do not value school or see it as that important. In our survey, 22 percent of learners said schools was only somewhat important, not that important, or not at all important for their future.
In focus groups with learners, most but not all learners thought school was important.
âNo â there are other pathways to successââ â Learner
âItâs not important to come everyday because a lot of the stuff weâre taught at school isnât useful for real lifeââ - Learner
With school being proven to play such a crucial role in educating learners and preparing them for the future, it is concerning to see so many parents and learners not identifying school as important.
Figure 10: Extent to which learners think school is important for their future
There is a strong relationship between attending school and achieving at school. This section reports on:
Most parents value regular school attendance, but a small but significant group do not recognise the value of attending school regularly. In our survey, we found 8 percent of parents thought attending school every day was either somewhat important, not that important, or not important at all. Parents who did not think school was important for their childâs future also did not think attending school every day was important.
Figure 11: Extent to which parents think going to school every day is important for their child
In focus groups we heard a similar story. Most parents said attendance was important for their child, but there was still a small number of parents who said it was not important to them. Some parents in our focus groups said they thought that regular attendance was more important in secondary school when the learning was harder and linked to national assessments.
âAt primary school, I would take children out of school for life experiences. Once at high school, attendance is more important. They are learning about schedules, time keeping, social skills. They need commitment and thinking ahead about pathways.â- Parent
âIn primary it is important to attend but not crucial. From Year 9 and up it is more and more important. Should be treated like a job, school isnât always amazing or not boring but you need to go and build the habit.â - Parent
Similarly, recent Ministry of Education research on perceptions of attendance showed that respondents were less likely to identify attendance as an issue in primary schools (20 percent of respondents in this study thought attendance was an issue in primary schools versus secondary schools; conversely 40 percent thought it was an issue in secondary schools).56
Many parents are comfortable with their child missing school. Across all the parents:
Figure 12: Amount of school across a term parents feel comfortable with their child missing
âFamilies maybe feeling better about keeping kids home because they are more familiar with online learning and resources and more at ease supporting children at homeâ - Teacher
Compared to parents, even fewer learners see regular school attendance as important. A third (33 percent) of learners think attending school every day was either somewhat important, not that important, or not important at all.
In focus groups with learners, there were some learners who didnât think attending regularly was important.
âNo, not important, one day absent a week isnât going to do anything to âmy learningââ- Learner
âItâs not important to come every day because a lot of the stuff we learn at school isnât useful for real life â for example getting a job; for example algebra, pythagorasâ- Learner
Figure 13: Extent to which learners think going to school every day is important
One in five learners (19 percent) are not too worried (not at all worried or not that worried) about catching up after missing one week of school.
Figure14: Extent to which learners feel worried about catching up on schoolwork after missing one week of school
Learners do not see the value of attending five days a week of school. Less than half of learners (42 percent) would choose to go to school five days a week if they could choose. Just under a third (29 percent) would want to go four days a week and the remaining (29 percent) would want to attend three days or less.
Figure15: Number of days learners would go to school if it was only up to them to choose
Missing school is sometimes driven by prioritising other activities.
This section reports on parentsâ and learnersâ attitudes towards missing school in favour of the following priorities (in order of importance):
We found that two thirds of parents (67 percent) are likely or very likely not to send their child to school if there were whÄnau/family/cultural or special events such as funeral, tangihanga, or weddings during school time. In Term 2 8 percent of parents identified whÄnau/family/cultural or special events such as funeral, tangihanga, or weddings as a reason for why they had kept their child out of school.
In our focus groups we heard parents talk about the importance to them of their children participating in family and cultural events and how this contributes to identity and belonging. Â We heard that this is a key reason to keep their children out of school.
âDefinitely funerals â and with our funerals they can sometimes be two weeks long â it is important that they are learning about culture, cultural practices and family duties. I make sure they get involved in that.â â Pacific parent
 âA really special occasion, like a family event is more important to me than missing one day of school. But it would have to be really special.â â Parent
Figure 16: Likelihood of parents keeping their child out of school for a âwhÄnau/family/cultural or special event such as Funeral, Tangihanga, Weddingâ
Learners are less likely than parents to prioritise family and cultural events - only two out of 10 learners (17 percent) indicated that having a whÄnau/family/cultural/special event on during school time (for example, birthday, funeral, tangihanga, weddings) made them want to miss school. Ten percent of learners had missed school in the last term for a whÄnau/family event (for example, birthday, funeral, tangihanga).
We heard in the learner focus groups that family events sometimes got in the way of learners coming to school. This included things such as spending time with family visitors.
âFamily visitors- spending time with themâ â Learner
Family holidays are a key reason learners miss school. Nearly half of parents (46 percent) are likely or very likely to keep their child out of school to go on a short family holiday for one to two days and just over a third of parents (35 percent) are likely or very likely to keep their child out of school to go on holiday for one or more weeks. Nearly one out of 10 learners (9 percent) reported missing school in the last two weeks for a holiday.
In the focus groups, parents gave a variety of reasons for taking holidays in the school term including overseas family reunification after Covid-19, cost of travel during school holidays, and the view that travel was a learning experience.
âA time we donât send them to school â is when we go away on holiday because it is very expensive to go in school holidays. So we choose to go beforeâ â Parent
âHolidays- I donât hesitate booking a holiday during the term time. I donât have an issue pulling them out. What they would gain from an overseas trip- learning experiencesâ â Parent
âParents take you out for family tripsâ â Learner
Figure 17: Likelihood of parents keeping their child out of school for a âwhÄnau/family holiday for one or two daysâ
Four out of 10 parents (41 percent) are likely or very likely to not send their child to school if they are participating in an out-of-school sports event. Our survey showed that 7 percent of learners had missed school in the last two weeks because they were doing another activity (cultural or sporting).
This also came up in the focus groups with parents.
âSporting events- representing the schoolâ â Parent
âAttending dancing exams, speech & drama examsâ â Parent
Figure 18: Likelihood of parents keeping their child out of school for âchild participating in an out-of-school sporting eventâ
Over one in 10 parents (12 percent) are likely or very likely to not send their child to school on their birthday. Â
Birthdays also came up in the focus groups with parents as reasons for why parents let their children stay home, along with other more enjoyable things happening at home.
âBirthdays- especially when they were younger- when I was a stay at home mumâ - Parent
âIf there is something awesome happening at the farm.â â Parent
âSomething fun on at home, something more interesting not at school.â â Parent
Figure 19: Likelihood of parents keeping their child out of school for âchildâs birthdayâ
For a third of learners (33 percent), having something more enjoyable to do at home makes them want to miss school.
âThey'd rather be at home chilling than being at school learningâ â Learner
Some learners do not go to school as they need to look after family members. Just under one in 10 parents (7 percent) are likely or very likely to keep their child out of school if they needed to look after another whÄnau/family member. However, only 1 percent of parents had kept their child home in the last term for this reason.
âTo help family if there are no other people availableâ â Parent
Just under one in 10 learners (8 percent) identified looking after sick relatives as something that would make them want to miss school. We also heard that 7 percent of learners had missed school in the last two weeks because they had visited or looked after a sick family member.
âBecause they have to look after their brothers and sistersâ â Learner
Learners in the focus groups said babysitting was a reason for not being able to attend school. Schools also identified looking after family members as something that impacts on learnersâ ability to attend school.
âGirls staying home to look after younger children and learners working and picking up odd hours when they should be at schoolâ â School leader
Figure 20: Likelihood of parents keeping their child out of school for âchild looking after another whÄnau/family member(s)â
Work is another reason learners miss school. Almost one in 10 parents (7 percent) are likely or very likely to not send their child to school if their child works a paid job.
In the focus group we heard that parents sometimes kept their children home to help with things that needed doing.
âWhen we need a hand on the farmâ â Parent.
We also heard some parents had supported their child to miss school if their childâs paid job was short staffed and needed their child to work.
â[Child] works some part time jobs. On quiet days at school, she will work a job that is short staffed, but only if she is up to date with schoolworkâ- Parent
Learners are less keen to miss school to work. Only 1 percent of learners identified working a job during school hours was something that would make them want to miss school, but 3 percent had missed school to work in the last two weeks.
The theme of working paid jobs came through in the learner focus groups as well, both as a competing priority in deciding to go to school and the impact that working out of school hours has on energy levels at school. Â
âAfter lockdown found it hard to return because I wanted to make moneyââ Learner
âWorking late on a Sunday nightââ â Learner
Just over one in four schools reported more senior learners working paid jobs and leaving school for work.
âA number are picking up paid work, working through the night â when it comes to coming to school â too tired; across Yr 12s also. Kids are saying I need to work because my family needs the money â used to be because they want extra money.â â Teacher
There a number of learner, family, school, and community barriers to attendance. Parents and learners told us about some of the barriers they faced which interfered with attending school.
This section reports on the main identified barriers (in order of importance):
Two thirds of parents are likely or very likely not to send their child to school if they had either a minor (67 percent) or chronic illness/injury (63 percent). In Term 2, 2022, 76 percent of parents had kept their child home for a minor illness and 11 percent of parents had kept their child home for chronic illness/injury.
Figure 21: Likelihood of parents keeping their child out of school for âchild having a minor illness or injuryâ
In parent focus groups, health and medical reasons, including mental health, are the most prevalent reason for not sending their child to school.
âGo to school no matter what, unless illness including mental health. There is lots of pressures these daysâ â Parent
âCovid Symptoms, to prevent her going to school and being sent home this would then take me out of work to go and collect her so easier not to send when symptoms are showing (cough, runny nose etc)â â Parent
The schools we spoke to had noticed parents are more inclined to keep their children home for sickness.
âIn last few years - extra caution - keeping home. Staying home for milder illnesses; staying home for longer periods. We used to have a guide - if child sick keep home for 48 hrs - now keeping home for an extra few days - just in case - and to avoid other circulating bugsâ â School leader
Our survey found that over half (55 percent) of learners identified being sick as a reason they had missed school in the last two weeks.
âMost get sick due to the fact covid is coming back into action taking away the tamariki from learningâ â Learner
Nearly three quarters of the schools we talked to reported they had seen increased absences for sickness. Just over half of schools are seeing longer absences for sickness.
Figure 22: Percentage of learners identifying health-related reasons for not going to school in the last two weeks
Covid-19 We found that for more than one in seven learners (14 percent) being worried about catching Covid-19 made them want to miss school and 4 percent of learners had missed school in the last two weeks for this reason. About one in 10 learners (12 percent) had missed school in the last two weeks because they were isolating from Covid-19 weeks. Younger learners are more likely to report that they want to miss school because they are worried about catching Covid-19 (24 percent Year 4 to 6, 8 percent Year 11 to 13). Learners from low decile schools are also more likely to want to miss school because they are worried about catching Covid-19 (21 percent low decile, 12 percent high decile). |
Aotearoa New Zealand has high rates of youth mental illness, which can be a barrier to attendance.
Nearly half of parents (46 percent) are likely or very likely to keep their child out of school if they have mental health challenges. Eleven percent had kept their child home for mental health in the last term.
âMy child has had severe anxiety and other serious mental health challenges, getting them to school every day has been a real challenge for this child and does affect attendanceâ â Parent
Figure 23: Likelihood of parents keeping their child out of school for âchild having mental health challenges/anxietyâ
Some learners identified mental health and anxiety challenges as reasons for not attending.
âIâd say mental health and anxiety is a big reason some kids donât enjoy school I know because it affected meâ â Learners
âMental health -struggling to function in day-to-day lifeâ â LearnerÂ
About a quarter of the schools reported increases in mental health or school-work related anxiety as reasons for absence.
Aotearoa New Zealand has high rates of bullying, which can be a barrier to going to school.
More than a third of parents (38 percent) are likely or very likely to not send their child to school if their child is being bullied. Four percent of parents kept their child home in the last term due to bullying.
Figure 24: Likelihood of parents keeping their child out of school for âchild being bulliedâ
Parents in the focus groups identified bullying and social issues as reasons for not sending their children to school.
âBullying, there have been a couple of kids physically attack and make racist remarksâ - Parent
âWhen I feel school is unsafe for my childâ â Parent
âBullying, and my son struggles to fit in and there isnât really a lot of helpâ â Parent
Bullying and friends matters to learners. One in 10 learners (10 percent) indicated experiences of bullying made them want to miss school. Three percent of learners identified this as a reason for not going to school in the last two weeks.
Nearly one in six (15 percent) learners said not liking the people in their class made them want to miss school and 5 percent of learners said not wanting to be around their classmates was a reason they hadnât attended in the last two weeks.
Learners in the focus groups identified bullying as something that gets in the way of attending school.
âStuff at school, bullying, no friends, friend drama (choose not to go to an adult because you donât want to be a snitch) â happens often; others get involved â ie siblings; social media pages being set up to target learnersââ â Learner
âSomebody teases you and bullies you every dayââ â Learner
Figure 25: Percentage of learners identifying social-related reasons for wanting to miss school
Nearly two in 10 parents (18 percent) are likely or very likely to not send their child to school if they are unable to participate in a planned school activity (for example, swimming sports). We heard that 2 percent of parents had kept their child home for this reason in the last term.
Figure 26: Likelihood of parents keeping their child out of school for âchild not being able to participate in a school activityâ
We also heard in the focus groups with parents that certain school activities and events discouraged attendance.
âSports day or swimming he is allowed to miss.â â ParentÂ
âNot wanting to do something on that day. Son is shy, doesnât like performing, when there are speeches, will do anything to stay home.â â Parents
âSporting events- not wanting to participate. Swimming sports, cross country. Itâs about peer influence- care too much about what others think and sayâ -Parent
We found that 21 percent of learners wanted to miss school as they didnât want to participate in certain school activities.
Figure 27: Percentage of learners identifying school activities as reasons for wanting to miss school
Six percent of learners said wanting to avoid something at school had led to them missing school in the last two weeks.
Learners in the focus groups also identified avoiding certain events as a reason making them want to miss school. Learners talked about feeling self-conscious and afraid to do activities in front of peers and some disliked certain activities so much they would avoid school that day.
âNervous on cross country days if you feel you are going to loseââ â Learner
We found that 7 percent of parents are likely or very likely to not send their child to school if their child did not want to go to school. Seven percent of parents also had not sent their child to school in the last term because their child had not wanted to go.
In the focus groups with parents we also heard that children not wanting to attend school was a reason for not sending their child to school.
âIf child voices that she doesnât want to go, we will listenâ â Parent
Parents told us that being disengaged from school, not being interested in what is taught, and not having a positive relationship with teachers were reasons they felt their children were not keen to go to school.
âWhen the programme is boringâ â Parent Â
âTeachers might not like them, donât want to go to their class. If you enjoy the teacher and youâre learning from them, youâll like to be there. If not you wonât want to be there.â â Parent
âLack of recognition from teachers, de-motivated them from going the next day.â â Parent
Schooling factors are a driver for some learners not wanting to attend school. We found:
Figure 28: Percentage of learners identifying lack of engagement reasons for wanting to miss school
Almost two in 10 learners (19 percent) identified not feeling like going to school as a reason for not having gone in the last two weeks
Teaching and learning that was boring, unengaging, or repetitive was identified in the focus groups as reasons for not attending, which often stemmed from negative teacher relationships.
âTeachers; some donât connect with learners; some seem like they hate kids; they target you; makes you ditch or want to ditch certain periodsââ -Learner
âSome classes are boring. Canât sit next to friends. Just writing with pen and paperââ. â Learner
âDonât like school. It is too repetitive across the years. You are learning the same thing year after year. Not learning new things.ââ â Learner
âThe core subjects you have to do can put you off. If you donât want to do anything like that in the futureââ â Learners
Schools reported learners are missing more parts of day, either by missing classes during the day or starting school late.
Just over one in 10 parents (12 percent) are likely or very likely to not send their child to school if their child was tired. We heard that 10 percent of parents did keep their child home for tiredness in the last term.
Figure 29: Likelihood of parents keeping their child out of school for âchild being tiredâ
Tiredness was a common reason identified in the parent focus group for their child not attending.
âI gauge their energy, if they have had a long week of activities and look really tired, they need a breakâ â Parent
â15 year olds donât work well in the morning, they are growing and they are tired. Why canât we start school later?â â Parent
âHard to get bed early so wakes up tiredâ â Parent
A third of learners (35 percent) indicated that getting up in the morning when they had been up late made them want to miss school.Â
In the focus groups learners identified being tired as something that made them want to miss school.
âBeing tired â sometimes we have lots of things after schoolââ â Learner
âItâs hard to get upââ â Learner
âGet home late from extra- curricular activities â too tired to go next dayââ- Learner
Schools also identified tiredness as a something that discourages learners from attending.
âParents more inclined to keep at home for tirednessâ â Teacher/school leader
âStaying up so late on gaming or other things â so too tiredâ â Teacher/school leader
Over one in 10 (10 percent) parents are likely or very likely to not send their child to school if transport was challenging and 5 percent of parents kept their child home due to transport issues in the last term.
Figure 30: Likelihood of parents keeping their child out of school for âtransporting child to school being challengingâ
Weather events and difficulty transporting children to school was identified by parents as challenges in the survey responses and in the parent focus groups.
âUnable to transport them to school due to lack of transport, too far to walk to bus, no vehicle, school 20 kms plus from homeâ â Parent
âSafety- if the weather is really bad, keep them home. Flood, trees coming down, feel better keeping them at homeâ â Parent
One in three schools also identified difficulties with transport as influencing attendance in their school community.
âTransport becoming an issue to get to schoolâ â School leader
âMost kids travel by bus - if you miss the bus then that's itâ â School leader
We found 6 percent of learners identified difficulties getting to and from school as a reason for wanting to miss school. Three percent of learners were unable to attend school due to transport difficulties in the last two weeks.
Learners in the learner focus groups also identified getting to school as a challenge that interfered with attendance.
âSometimes there is only one bus â and if you miss it you are late or canât come. Sometimes school doesnât understandââ â Learner
Just over one in 10Â parents (13 percent) are likely or very likely to not send their child to school if they did not have the right equipment (for example, shoes, uniform, money for events).
Figure 31: Likelihood of parents keeping their child out of school for âchild not having the right equipment to attend schoolâ
Lack of resources was also identified in parentsâ open-ended survey responses as a reason for absence in the last term.
âI feel ashamed to say that when I haven't had enough money for something to put into school lunches and when there have been school trips that I couldn't afford I haven't sent my son to school.â â Parent
Ten of the 40 schools we talked to identified material hardship (income, poverty, lack of food) as a factor influencing attendance in their school community.
âPoverty - price of petrol - instead of coming five days - they can only afford to come threeâ - School leader Â
Ten of the 40 schools we talked to identified housing (including emergency housing, housing development, and displacement through Covid-19) as a factor influencing attendance in their school community.
âWe have a big housing development in our area - housing has been disrupted - some families have been moved out of homes while demolished and rebuilt - has impacted us as a school - housing in general - people moving slightly further awayâ â School leader
âWe have had known cases of learners living in cars or living in the caravan park.â â School leaders
More than one in 10 (13 percent) learners reported that they never, rarely, or only sometimes had everything they needed to go to school (for example, uniform, shoes, jacket, lunch). Â
Figure 32: Frequency of learners having everything they need to go to school
 Learners identified hardship reasons for non-attendance.
âNo petrol in car, no foodâ â Learner
âThey donât have clean uniforms or they find learning hard. Some are tired or hungry.â - Learner
Aotearoa New Zealandâs concerning levels of attendance reflect the value placed on attendance, prioritisation of other activities, and barriers to attendance.
The three things that are most commonly prioritised above school attendance are: Â
The three most common barriers are:
Families experiencing material hardship are likely to experience these barriers at higher rates and additional barriers including transport challenges and a lack of resources to support schooling (for example, equipment, uniforms, food etc).
The findings from the teacher and school interviews and focus groups are largely consistent with the parent and learner surveys and interviews.
Understanding when and why learners are not going to school will help raise attendance.
We found many reasons why learners are missing school. Concerningly, some parents and learners told us that they do not see school as that important.
Many parents and learners, while valuing schooling and attendance, still prioritise other activities over attendance. There are also barriers to attendance.
We have seen that attendance in Aotearoa New Zealand is declining and a range of learner, family, community, and economic factors can impact on attendance. This section of the report outlines the range of factors we found that impacted on attendance.
Achievement at school leads to positive lifelong outcomes. This section reports on:
While most parents do value school and think it is important for their child, 8 percent of parents reported that school was only somewhat important, not that important, or not important at all for their childâs future.
Figure 9: Extent to which parents think school is important for their childâs future
In focus groups, we heard a similar story. Most parents indicated they felt school was important for their child, but there was still a small number of parents who indicated school was not as important to them. Parents who didnât value school as highly had a variety of reasons for doing so.
âFor our eldest â not so much â sheâs not going to be a doctor or lawyer â she is a sports person. Her attendance is shocking because she is travelling so much.ââ - Parent of secondary learner
We found an even larger proportion of learners do not value school or see it as that important. In our survey, 22 percent of learners said schools was only somewhat important, not that important, or not at all important for their future.
In focus groups with learners, most but not all learners thought school was important.
âNo â there are other pathways to successââ â Learner
âItâs not important to come everyday because a lot of the stuff weâre taught at school isnât useful for real lifeââ - Learner
With school being proven to play such a crucial role in educating learners and preparing them for the future, it is concerning to see so many parents and learners not identifying school as important.
Figure 10: Extent to which learners think school is important for their future
There is a strong relationship between attending school and achieving at school. This section reports on:
Most parents value regular school attendance, but a small but significant group do not recognise the value of attending school regularly. In our survey, we found 8 percent of parents thought attending school every day was either somewhat important, not that important, or not important at all. Parents who did not think school was important for their childâs future also did not think attending school every day was important.
Figure 11: Extent to which parents think going to school every day is important for their child
In focus groups we heard a similar story. Most parents said attendance was important for their child, but there was still a small number of parents who said it was not important to them. Some parents in our focus groups said they thought that regular attendance was more important in secondary school when the learning was harder and linked to national assessments.
âAt primary school, I would take children out of school for life experiences. Once at high school, attendance is more important. They are learning about schedules, time keeping, social skills. They need commitment and thinking ahead about pathways.â- Parent
âIn primary it is important to attend but not crucial. From Year 9 and up it is more and more important. Should be treated like a job, school isnât always amazing or not boring but you need to go and build the habit.â - Parent
Similarly, recent Ministry of Education research on perceptions of attendance showed that respondents were less likely to identify attendance as an issue in primary schools (20 percent of respondents in this study thought attendance was an issue in primary schools versus secondary schools; conversely 40 percent thought it was an issue in secondary schools).56
Many parents are comfortable with their child missing school. Across all the parents:
Figure 12: Amount of school across a term parents feel comfortable with their child missing
âFamilies maybe feeling better about keeping kids home because they are more familiar with online learning and resources and more at ease supporting children at homeâ - Teacher
Compared to parents, even fewer learners see regular school attendance as important. A third (33 percent) of learners think attending school every day was either somewhat important, not that important, or not important at all.
In focus groups with learners, there were some learners who didnât think attending regularly was important.
âNo, not important, one day absent a week isnât going to do anything to âmy learningââ- Learner
âItâs not important to come every day because a lot of the stuff we learn at school isnât useful for real life â for example getting a job; for example algebra, pythagorasâ- Learner
Figure 13: Extent to which learners think going to school every day is important
One in five learners (19 percent) are not too worried (not at all worried or not that worried) about catching up after missing one week of school.
Figure14: Extent to which learners feel worried about catching up on schoolwork after missing one week of school
Learners do not see the value of attending five days a week of school. Less than half of learners (42 percent) would choose to go to school five days a week if they could choose. Just under a third (29 percent) would want to go four days a week and the remaining (29 percent) would want to attend three days or less.
Figure15: Number of days learners would go to school if it was only up to them to choose
Missing school is sometimes driven by prioritising other activities.
This section reports on parentsâ and learnersâ attitudes towards missing school in favour of the following priorities (in order of importance):
We found that two thirds of parents (67 percent) are likely or very likely not to send their child to school if there were whÄnau/family/cultural or special events such as funeral, tangihanga, or weddings during school time. In Term 2 8 percent of parents identified whÄnau/family/cultural or special events such as funeral, tangihanga, or weddings as a reason for why they had kept their child out of school.
In our focus groups we heard parents talk about the importance to them of their children participating in family and cultural events and how this contributes to identity and belonging. Â We heard that this is a key reason to keep their children out of school.
âDefinitely funerals â and with our funerals they can sometimes be two weeks long â it is important that they are learning about culture, cultural practices and family duties. I make sure they get involved in that.â â Pacific parent
 âA really special occasion, like a family event is more important to me than missing one day of school. But it would have to be really special.â â Parent
Figure 16: Likelihood of parents keeping their child out of school for a âwhÄnau/family/cultural or special event such as Funeral, Tangihanga, Weddingâ
Learners are less likely than parents to prioritise family and cultural events - only two out of 10 learners (17 percent) indicated that having a whÄnau/family/cultural/special event on during school time (for example, birthday, funeral, tangihanga, weddings) made them want to miss school. Ten percent of learners had missed school in the last term for a whÄnau/family event (for example, birthday, funeral, tangihanga).
We heard in the learner focus groups that family events sometimes got in the way of learners coming to school. This included things such as spending time with family visitors.
âFamily visitors- spending time with themâ â Learner
Family holidays are a key reason learners miss school. Nearly half of parents (46 percent) are likely or very likely to keep their child out of school to go on a short family holiday for one to two days and just over a third of parents (35 percent) are likely or very likely to keep their child out of school to go on holiday for one or more weeks. Nearly one out of 10 learners (9 percent) reported missing school in the last two weeks for a holiday.
In the focus groups, parents gave a variety of reasons for taking holidays in the school term including overseas family reunification after Covid-19, cost of travel during school holidays, and the view that travel was a learning experience.
âA time we donât send them to school â is when we go away on holiday because it is very expensive to go in school holidays. So we choose to go beforeâ â Parent
âHolidays- I donât hesitate booking a holiday during the term time. I donât have an issue pulling them out. What they would gain from an overseas trip- learning experiencesâ â Parent
âParents take you out for family tripsâ â Learner
Figure 17: Likelihood of parents keeping their child out of school for a âwhÄnau/family holiday for one or two daysâ
Four out of 10 parents (41 percent) are likely or very likely to not send their child to school if they are participating in an out-of-school sports event. Our survey showed that 7 percent of learners had missed school in the last two weeks because they were doing another activity (cultural or sporting).
This also came up in the focus groups with parents.
âSporting events- representing the schoolâ â Parent
âAttending dancing exams, speech & drama examsâ â Parent
Figure 18: Likelihood of parents keeping their child out of school for âchild participating in an out-of-school sporting eventâ
Over one in 10 parents (12 percent) are likely or very likely to not send their child to school on their birthday. Â
Birthdays also came up in the focus groups with parents as reasons for why parents let their children stay home, along with other more enjoyable things happening at home.
âBirthdays- especially when they were younger- when I was a stay at home mumâ - Parent
âIf there is something awesome happening at the farm.â â Parent
âSomething fun on at home, something more interesting not at school.â â Parent
Figure 19: Likelihood of parents keeping their child out of school for âchildâs birthdayâ
For a third of learners (33 percent), having something more enjoyable to do at home makes them want to miss school.
âThey'd rather be at home chilling than being at school learningâ â Learner
Some learners do not go to school as they need to look after family members. Just under one in 10 parents (7 percent) are likely or very likely to keep their child out of school if they needed to look after another whÄnau/family member. However, only 1 percent of parents had kept their child home in the last term for this reason.
âTo help family if there are no other people availableâ â Parent
Just under one in 10 learners (8 percent) identified looking after sick relatives as something that would make them want to miss school. We also heard that 7 percent of learners had missed school in the last two weeks because they had visited or looked after a sick family member.
âBecause they have to look after their brothers and sistersâ â Learner
Learners in the focus groups said babysitting was a reason for not being able to attend school. Schools also identified looking after family members as something that impacts on learnersâ ability to attend school.
âGirls staying home to look after younger children and learners working and picking up odd hours when they should be at schoolâ â School leader
Figure 20: Likelihood of parents keeping their child out of school for âchild looking after another whÄnau/family member(s)â
Work is another reason learners miss school. Almost one in 10 parents (7 percent) are likely or very likely to not send their child to school if their child works a paid job.
In the focus group we heard that parents sometimes kept their children home to help with things that needed doing.
âWhen we need a hand on the farmâ â Parent.
We also heard some parents had supported their child to miss school if their childâs paid job was short staffed and needed their child to work.
â[Child] works some part time jobs. On quiet days at school, she will work a job that is short staffed, but only if she is up to date with schoolworkâ- Parent
Learners are less keen to miss school to work. Only 1 percent of learners identified working a job during school hours was something that would make them want to miss school, but 3 percent had missed school to work in the last two weeks.
The theme of working paid jobs came through in the learner focus groups as well, both as a competing priority in deciding to go to school and the impact that working out of school hours has on energy levels at school. Â
âAfter lockdown found it hard to return because I wanted to make moneyââ Learner
âWorking late on a Sunday nightââ â Learner
Just over one in four schools reported more senior learners working paid jobs and leaving school for work.
âA number are picking up paid work, working through the night â when it comes to coming to school â too tired; across Yr 12s also. Kids are saying I need to work because my family needs the money â used to be because they want extra money.â â Teacher
There a number of learner, family, school, and community barriers to attendance. Parents and learners told us about some of the barriers they faced which interfered with attending school.
This section reports on the main identified barriers (in order of importance):
Two thirds of parents are likely or very likely not to send their child to school if they had either a minor (67 percent) or chronic illness/injury (63 percent). In Term 2, 2022, 76 percent of parents had kept their child home for a minor illness and 11 percent of parents had kept their child home for chronic illness/injury.
Figure 21: Likelihood of parents keeping their child out of school for âchild having a minor illness or injuryâ
In parent focus groups, health and medical reasons, including mental health, are the most prevalent reason for not sending their child to school.
âGo to school no matter what, unless illness including mental health. There is lots of pressures these daysâ â Parent
âCovid Symptoms, to prevent her going to school and being sent home this would then take me out of work to go and collect her so easier not to send when symptoms are showing (cough, runny nose etc)â â Parent
The schools we spoke to had noticed parents are more inclined to keep their children home for sickness.
âIn last few years - extra caution - keeping home. Staying home for milder illnesses; staying home for longer periods. We used to have a guide - if child sick keep home for 48 hrs - now keeping home for an extra few days - just in case - and to avoid other circulating bugsâ â School leader
Our survey found that over half (55 percent) of learners identified being sick as a reason they had missed school in the last two weeks.
âMost get sick due to the fact covid is coming back into action taking away the tamariki from learningâ â Learner
Nearly three quarters of the schools we talked to reported they had seen increased absences for sickness. Just over half of schools are seeing longer absences for sickness.
Figure 22: Percentage of learners identifying health-related reasons for not going to school in the last two weeks
Covid-19 We found that for more than one in seven learners (14 percent) being worried about catching Covid-19 made them want to miss school and 4 percent of learners had missed school in the last two weeks for this reason. About one in 10 learners (12 percent) had missed school in the last two weeks because they were isolating from Covid-19 weeks. Younger learners are more likely to report that they want to miss school because they are worried about catching Covid-19 (24 percent Year 4 to 6, 8 percent Year 11 to 13). Learners from low decile schools are also more likely to want to miss school because they are worried about catching Covid-19 (21 percent low decile, 12 percent high decile). |
Aotearoa New Zealand has high rates of youth mental illness, which can be a barrier to attendance.
Nearly half of parents (46 percent) are likely or very likely to keep their child out of school if they have mental health challenges. Eleven percent had kept their child home for mental health in the last term.
âMy child has had severe anxiety and other serious mental health challenges, getting them to school every day has been a real challenge for this child and does affect attendanceâ â Parent
Figure 23: Likelihood of parents keeping their child out of school for âchild having mental health challenges/anxietyâ
Some learners identified mental health and anxiety challenges as reasons for not attending.
âIâd say mental health and anxiety is a big reason some kids donât enjoy school I know because it affected meâ â Learners
âMental health -struggling to function in day-to-day lifeâ â LearnerÂ
About a quarter of the schools reported increases in mental health or school-work related anxiety as reasons for absence.
Aotearoa New Zealand has high rates of bullying, which can be a barrier to going to school.
More than a third of parents (38 percent) are likely or very likely to not send their child to school if their child is being bullied. Four percent of parents kept their child home in the last term due to bullying.
Figure 24: Likelihood of parents keeping their child out of school for âchild being bulliedâ
Parents in the focus groups identified bullying and social issues as reasons for not sending their children to school.
âBullying, there have been a couple of kids physically attack and make racist remarksâ - Parent
âWhen I feel school is unsafe for my childâ â Parent
âBullying, and my son struggles to fit in and there isnât really a lot of helpâ â Parent
Bullying and friends matters to learners. One in 10 learners (10 percent) indicated experiences of bullying made them want to miss school. Three percent of learners identified this as a reason for not going to school in the last two weeks.
Nearly one in six (15 percent) learners said not liking the people in their class made them want to miss school and 5 percent of learners said not wanting to be around their classmates was a reason they hadnât attended in the last two weeks.
Learners in the focus groups identified bullying as something that gets in the way of attending school.
âStuff at school, bullying, no friends, friend drama (choose not to go to an adult because you donât want to be a snitch) â happens often; others get involved â ie siblings; social media pages being set up to target learnersââ â Learner
âSomebody teases you and bullies you every dayââ â Learner
Figure 25: Percentage of learners identifying social-related reasons for wanting to miss school
Nearly two in 10 parents (18 percent) are likely or very likely to not send their child to school if they are unable to participate in a planned school activity (for example, swimming sports). We heard that 2 percent of parents had kept their child home for this reason in the last term.
Figure 26: Likelihood of parents keeping their child out of school for âchild not being able to participate in a school activityâ
We also heard in the focus groups with parents that certain school activities and events discouraged attendance.
âSports day or swimming he is allowed to miss.â â ParentÂ
âNot wanting to do something on that day. Son is shy, doesnât like performing, when there are speeches, will do anything to stay home.â â Parents
âSporting events- not wanting to participate. Swimming sports, cross country. Itâs about peer influence- care too much about what others think and sayâ -Parent
We found that 21 percent of learners wanted to miss school as they didnât want to participate in certain school activities.
Figure 27: Percentage of learners identifying school activities as reasons for wanting to miss school
Six percent of learners said wanting to avoid something at school had led to them missing school in the last two weeks.
Learners in the focus groups also identified avoiding certain events as a reason making them want to miss school. Learners talked about feeling self-conscious and afraid to do activities in front of peers and some disliked certain activities so much they would avoid school that day.
âNervous on cross country days if you feel you are going to loseââ â Learner
We found that 7 percent of parents are likely or very likely to not send their child to school if their child did not want to go to school. Seven percent of parents also had not sent their child to school in the last term because their child had not wanted to go.
In the focus groups with parents we also heard that children not wanting to attend school was a reason for not sending their child to school.
âIf child voices that she doesnât want to go, we will listenâ â Parent
Parents told us that being disengaged from school, not being interested in what is taught, and not having a positive relationship with teachers were reasons they felt their children were not keen to go to school.
âWhen the programme is boringâ â Parent Â
âTeachers might not like them, donât want to go to their class. If you enjoy the teacher and youâre learning from them, youâll like to be there. If not you wonât want to be there.â â Parent
âLack of recognition from teachers, de-motivated them from going the next day.â â Parent
Schooling factors are a driver for some learners not wanting to attend school. We found:
Figure 28: Percentage of learners identifying lack of engagement reasons for wanting to miss school
Almost two in 10 learners (19 percent) identified not feeling like going to school as a reason for not having gone in the last two weeks
Teaching and learning that was boring, unengaging, or repetitive was identified in the focus groups as reasons for not attending, which often stemmed from negative teacher relationships.
âTeachers; some donât connect with learners; some seem like they hate kids; they target you; makes you ditch or want to ditch certain periodsââ -Learner
âSome classes are boring. Canât sit next to friends. Just writing with pen and paperââ. â Learner
âDonât like school. It is too repetitive across the years. You are learning the same thing year after year. Not learning new things.ââ â Learner
âThe core subjects you have to do can put you off. If you donât want to do anything like that in the futureââ â Learners
Schools reported learners are missing more parts of day, either by missing classes during the day or starting school late.
Just over one in 10 parents (12 percent) are likely or very likely to not send their child to school if their child was tired. We heard that 10 percent of parents did keep their child home for tiredness in the last term.
Figure 29: Likelihood of parents keeping their child out of school for âchild being tiredâ
Tiredness was a common reason identified in the parent focus group for their child not attending.
âI gauge their energy, if they have had a long week of activities and look really tired, they need a breakâ â Parent
â15 year olds donât work well in the morning, they are growing and they are tired. Why canât we start school later?â â Parent
âHard to get bed early so wakes up tiredâ â Parent
A third of learners (35 percent) indicated that getting up in the morning when they had been up late made them want to miss school.Â
In the focus groups learners identified being tired as something that made them want to miss school.
âBeing tired â sometimes we have lots of things after schoolââ â Learner
âItâs hard to get upââ â Learner
âGet home late from extra- curricular activities â too tired to go next dayââ- Learner
Schools also identified tiredness as a something that discourages learners from attending.
âParents more inclined to keep at home for tirednessâ â Teacher/school leader
âStaying up so late on gaming or other things â so too tiredâ â Teacher/school leader
Over one in 10 (10 percent) parents are likely or very likely to not send their child to school if transport was challenging and 5 percent of parents kept their child home due to transport issues in the last term.
Figure 30: Likelihood of parents keeping their child out of school for âtransporting child to school being challengingâ
Weather events and difficulty transporting children to school was identified by parents as challenges in the survey responses and in the parent focus groups.
âUnable to transport them to school due to lack of transport, too far to walk to bus, no vehicle, school 20 kms plus from homeâ â Parent
âSafety- if the weather is really bad, keep them home. Flood, trees coming down, feel better keeping them at homeâ â Parent
One in three schools also identified difficulties with transport as influencing attendance in their school community.
âTransport becoming an issue to get to schoolâ â School leader
âMost kids travel by bus - if you miss the bus then that's itâ â School leader
We found 6 percent of learners identified difficulties getting to and from school as a reason for wanting to miss school. Three percent of learners were unable to attend school due to transport difficulties in the last two weeks.
Learners in the learner focus groups also identified getting to school as a challenge that interfered with attendance.
âSometimes there is only one bus â and if you miss it you are late or canât come. Sometimes school doesnât understandââ â Learner
Just over one in 10Â parents (13 percent) are likely or very likely to not send their child to school if they did not have the right equipment (for example, shoes, uniform, money for events).
Figure 31: Likelihood of parents keeping their child out of school for âchild not having the right equipment to attend schoolâ
Lack of resources was also identified in parentsâ open-ended survey responses as a reason for absence in the last term.
âI feel ashamed to say that when I haven't had enough money for something to put into school lunches and when there have been school trips that I couldn't afford I haven't sent my son to school.â â Parent
Ten of the 40 schools we talked to identified material hardship (income, poverty, lack of food) as a factor influencing attendance in their school community.
âPoverty - price of petrol - instead of coming five days - they can only afford to come threeâ - School leader Â
Ten of the 40 schools we talked to identified housing (including emergency housing, housing development, and displacement through Covid-19) as a factor influencing attendance in their school community.
âWe have a big housing development in our area - housing has been disrupted - some families have been moved out of homes while demolished and rebuilt - has impacted us as a school - housing in general - people moving slightly further awayâ â School leader
âWe have had known cases of learners living in cars or living in the caravan park.â â School leaders
More than one in 10 (13 percent) learners reported that they never, rarely, or only sometimes had everything they needed to go to school (for example, uniform, shoes, jacket, lunch). Â
Figure 32: Frequency of learners having everything they need to go to school
 Learners identified hardship reasons for non-attendance.
âNo petrol in car, no foodâ â Learner
âThey donât have clean uniforms or they find learning hard. Some are tired or hungry.â - Learner
Aotearoa New Zealandâs concerning levels of attendance reflect the value placed on attendance, prioritisation of other activities, and barriers to attendance.
The three things that are most commonly prioritised above school attendance are: Â
The three most common barriers are:
Families experiencing material hardship are likely to experience these barriers at higher rates and additional barriers including transport challenges and a lack of resources to support schooling (for example, equipment, uniforms, food etc).
The findings from the teacher and school interviews and focus groups are largely consistent with the parent and learner surveys and interviews.
Everyday most learners in Aotearoa New Zealand go to school. They are motivated by a range of reasons including expectations and opportunities to learn, socialise, and do interesting things. Understanding these reasons can help us improve attendance. This section sets out the reasons why learners go to school.Â
This section shares what parents and learners told us about what motivates them to attend school, or to send their children to school. These are:
Parents in our surveys and focus groups identified learning, getting an education, and gaining important life skills and attitudes as key reasons for sending their children to school.
âImportant for the kids to be there through the school years. If you donât turn up then you donât learn the things that you are supposed toââ â Parent
âSchooling is vital. Especially for the education outcomes, and preparing them for a working life and getting them to be committed to be in one place and not necessarily having fun, and learning to workââ â Parent
Figure 33: Extent to which parents think school helping their child to learn useful skills and knowledge is an important reason when sending their child to school
Just over half (54 percent) want to go to school as they see how school could help them in the future. In addition, nearly four in 10 (37 percent) learners said they liked and are interested in what is being taught.
Figure 34: Percentage of learners identifying important learning for the future as reasons for wanting to go to school
Learning important things and gaining life and future skills were two of the most common reasons given for going to school by learners in our focus groups. Fear of falling behind in learning was also a motivator for school attendance for some of these learners.
âBecause the teachers might teach something important like spelling and if you need to do something formal in the future â you will need it. Or if you are buying something in a shop and someone was trying to cheat you â you would knowââ â Learner
âYou can miss so much in a day. Hard to get myself back in the game.ââ â Learner
Schools also identified learners caring about their education and it being linked to their goals as motivators for attending.
Going to school to socialise, build social skills, and make friends were key reasons for sending their children to school for parents in our surveys and focus groups. Parents in our focus groups understood that seeing and being with their friends was an important motivator for their childrenâs attendance at school, sometimes stronger than the learning.
âSocially if you arenât there for certain school events, you arenât part of community building. School offers community aspects which are important as well.ââ -Parent
âSchool is absolutely vital in terms of routine and social development â developing a peer group that they can relate to outside of their immediate family.ââ â Parent
Figure 35: Extent to which parents think school helping their child develop social skills is an important reason when sending their child to school
For most learners (80 percent), seeing and spending time with their friends makes them want to go to school.
Socialising and learning social skills were key reasons for attending school identified by learners in the focus groups also.
âMates give you motivationââ â Learner
âBecause you canât google social skillsââ â Learner
Schools can be a safe and supportive place that makes learners want to attend.Â
One in two (50 percent) learners have an adult at school who really cares about them.
For one in five learners (19 percent), school being somewhere they feel safe (physically, socially, and emotionally) makes them want to attend.
Around four in 10 learners (41 percent) indicated liking at least one teacher made them want to go to school and just over one in 10 (12 percent) indicated talking to adults they trust also made them want to go to school.
For nearly one in seven (14 percent) learners, getting food at school is a reason that made them want to go to school.
Figure 36: Percentage of students identifying social reasons for wanting to go to school
 Learners in the focus groups also identified positive social interactions with teachers as a key motivator for going to school.
âHaving your fave subjects and seeing your fave teachersââ â Learner
âPeople (teachers) who keep us motivated and have our backsââ â Learner
âTeacher who understandsââ - Learner
Parents in our focus groups also identified that positive social interactions with teachers was a motivating factor for their children attending school.
âThe social aspect encourages her to attend. Having engaging, respectful and knowledgeable teachers. The classes where the teachers show that â she is keen to go to.ââ â Parent
Nearly eight in 10 parents (79 percent) think that school being fun for their child is an important or very important reason for sending their child to school.
Figure 37: Extent to which parents think school being fun for their child is an important reason when sending their child to school Â
In focus groups parents spoke about the importance of experiences such as school camps, trips, visiting performers and experts, sports, science fairs, technology programmes, kapa haka, and school productions. Parents saw these as opportunities to learn collaboratively, draw on learner strengths and interests, and to apply learning in settings beyond school. They also saw them as opportunities they could not easily replicate at home.
âTime on technology. Lunchtime sports. If there is something fun on â bake sales, school trips, dress-up daysâ â Parents
âA particular sporting activity, favourite class â ie art â those days he is motivatedââ â Parent
âEvery day is a new day- they are learning new things â ie kapa haka. New activities. Things they donât get a chance to do at home.ââ â Parent
Similarly, four in 10 learners (41 percent) want to go to school to do activities such as sports or clubs. More than one in five learners (22 percent) want to go to school as it is better than being at home.
Figure 38: Percentage of students identifying fun activities as reasons for wanting to go to school
Doing fun and interesting things was the most common motivator for going to school identified by learners in focus groups. The opportunity to participate in co-curricular activities through school was also mentioned.
âClasses when you do things you enjoy â things that use your handsââ â Learners
âIf you go to school you can do after school activities â like sport. They send you home if you havenât been at schoolââ â Learners
âTo do some activities at our school you have to have 85 percent attendanceââ â Learners
Schools also identified doing fun and interesting activities at school as a motivator for their learners coming to school.
For 58 percent of parents, the law requiring they send their children to school was an important or very important reason for them to send their child to school.
In addition, nearly half (48 percent) of parents send their children to school because they had other things they needed to do (such as work).
Figure 39: Extent to which parents think the law saying they have to send their child to school is an important reason when sending their child to school
We also heard in the focus groups that needing to send their child to school was a reason for parents sending them.
âI work fulltime â so there is a domino effect of letting my team down if I have to be at home with my childââ - parent
Schools also reported needing to go to work was a key motivation for parents sending their children to school.
Most learners (90 percent) agreed their parents cared if they go to school. Sixty-six percent also agreed that their parents or whÄnau are proud when they go to school.
Those who agreed that
Are more likely to:
Figure 40: Extent to which learners agree or disagree with the statement âMy parents/caregivers care if I go to schoolâ
Parentsâ expectations were a motivation to attend school mentioned in every learner focus group.
âParents make you or encourage you to go. They want you to do well.ââ â Learner
âStrict parents make you goââ â Learner
School expectations also made a difference. Nearly three in four learners agree (74 percent) or strongly agree that their school cares if they went to school. One in four learners (25 percent) go to school to avoid getting into trouble for not attending.
Figure 41: Extent to which learners agree or disagree with the statement âMy school cares if I go to schoolâ
Both parents and learners are aware of, and influenced by, expectations for attendance. Parents are also highly motivated by their understanding that learning at school was important for their childrenâs future, and for their children to socialise and develop social skills.
Learners themselves are motivated by their parentsâ expectations but are less likely than parents to see their school learning as relevant to their future. Learners are very motivated by getting to spend time with their friends and to have opportunities to do fun things at school. They are more likely to attend if they have good relationships with their teachers and are interested in the things they are learning.
Everyday most learners in Aotearoa New Zealand go to school. They are motivated by a range of reasons including expectations and opportunities to learn, socialise, and do interesting things. Understanding these reasons can help us improve attendance. This section sets out the reasons why learners go to school.Â
This section shares what parents and learners told us about what motivates them to attend school, or to send their children to school. These are:
Parents in our surveys and focus groups identified learning, getting an education, and gaining important life skills and attitudes as key reasons for sending their children to school.
âImportant for the kids to be there through the school years. If you donât turn up then you donât learn the things that you are supposed toââ â Parent
âSchooling is vital. Especially for the education outcomes, and preparing them for a working life and getting them to be committed to be in one place and not necessarily having fun, and learning to workââ â Parent
Figure 33: Extent to which parents think school helping their child to learn useful skills and knowledge is an important reason when sending their child to school
Just over half (54 percent) want to go to school as they see how school could help them in the future. In addition, nearly four in 10 (37 percent) learners said they liked and are interested in what is being taught.
Figure 34: Percentage of learners identifying important learning for the future as reasons for wanting to go to school
Learning important things and gaining life and future skills were two of the most common reasons given for going to school by learners in our focus groups. Fear of falling behind in learning was also a motivator for school attendance for some of these learners.
âBecause the teachers might teach something important like spelling and if you need to do something formal in the future â you will need it. Or if you are buying something in a shop and someone was trying to cheat you â you would knowââ â Learner
âYou can miss so much in a day. Hard to get myself back in the game.ââ â Learner
Schools also identified learners caring about their education and it being linked to their goals as motivators for attending.
Going to school to socialise, build social skills, and make friends were key reasons for sending their children to school for parents in our surveys and focus groups. Parents in our focus groups understood that seeing and being with their friends was an important motivator for their childrenâs attendance at school, sometimes stronger than the learning.
âSocially if you arenât there for certain school events, you arenât part of community building. School offers community aspects which are important as well.ââ -Parent
âSchool is absolutely vital in terms of routine and social development â developing a peer group that they can relate to outside of their immediate family.ââ â Parent
Figure 35: Extent to which parents think school helping their child develop social skills is an important reason when sending their child to school
For most learners (80 percent), seeing and spending time with their friends makes them want to go to school.
Socialising and learning social skills were key reasons for attending school identified by learners in the focus groups also.
âMates give you motivationââ â Learner
âBecause you canât google social skillsââ â Learner
Schools can be a safe and supportive place that makes learners want to attend.Â
One in two (50 percent) learners have an adult at school who really cares about them.
For one in five learners (19 percent), school being somewhere they feel safe (physically, socially, and emotionally) makes them want to attend.
Around four in 10 learners (41 percent) indicated liking at least one teacher made them want to go to school and just over one in 10 (12 percent) indicated talking to adults they trust also made them want to go to school.
For nearly one in seven (14 percent) learners, getting food at school is a reason that made them want to go to school.
Figure 36: Percentage of students identifying social reasons for wanting to go to school
 Learners in the focus groups also identified positive social interactions with teachers as a key motivator for going to school.
âHaving your fave subjects and seeing your fave teachersââ â Learner
âPeople (teachers) who keep us motivated and have our backsââ â Learner
âTeacher who understandsââ - Learner
Parents in our focus groups also identified that positive social interactions with teachers was a motivating factor for their children attending school.
âThe social aspect encourages her to attend. Having engaging, respectful and knowledgeable teachers. The classes where the teachers show that â she is keen to go to.ââ â Parent
Nearly eight in 10 parents (79 percent) think that school being fun for their child is an important or very important reason for sending their child to school.
Figure 37: Extent to which parents think school being fun for their child is an important reason when sending their child to school Â
In focus groups parents spoke about the importance of experiences such as school camps, trips, visiting performers and experts, sports, science fairs, technology programmes, kapa haka, and school productions. Parents saw these as opportunities to learn collaboratively, draw on learner strengths and interests, and to apply learning in settings beyond school. They also saw them as opportunities they could not easily replicate at home.
âTime on technology. Lunchtime sports. If there is something fun on â bake sales, school trips, dress-up daysâ â Parents
âA particular sporting activity, favourite class â ie art â those days he is motivatedââ â Parent
âEvery day is a new day- they are learning new things â ie kapa haka. New activities. Things they donât get a chance to do at home.ââ â Parent
Similarly, four in 10 learners (41 percent) want to go to school to do activities such as sports or clubs. More than one in five learners (22 percent) want to go to school as it is better than being at home.
Figure 38: Percentage of students identifying fun activities as reasons for wanting to go to school
Doing fun and interesting things was the most common motivator for going to school identified by learners in focus groups. The opportunity to participate in co-curricular activities through school was also mentioned.
âClasses when you do things you enjoy â things that use your handsââ â Learners
âIf you go to school you can do after school activities â like sport. They send you home if you havenât been at schoolââ â Learners
âTo do some activities at our school you have to have 85 percent attendanceââ â Learners
Schools also identified doing fun and interesting activities at school as a motivator for their learners coming to school.
For 58 percent of parents, the law requiring they send their children to school was an important or very important reason for them to send their child to school.
In addition, nearly half (48 percent) of parents send their children to school because they had other things they needed to do (such as work).
Figure 39: Extent to which parents think the law saying they have to send their child to school is an important reason when sending their child to school
We also heard in the focus groups that needing to send their child to school was a reason for parents sending them.
âI work fulltime â so there is a domino effect of letting my team down if I have to be at home with my childââ - parent
Schools also reported needing to go to work was a key motivation for parents sending their children to school.
Most learners (90 percent) agreed their parents cared if they go to school. Sixty-six percent also agreed that their parents or whÄnau are proud when they go to school.
Those who agreed that
Are more likely to:
Figure 40: Extent to which learners agree or disagree with the statement âMy parents/caregivers care if I go to schoolâ
Parentsâ expectations were a motivation to attend school mentioned in every learner focus group.
âParents make you or encourage you to go. They want you to do well.ââ â Learner
âStrict parents make you goââ â Learner
School expectations also made a difference. Nearly three in four learners agree (74 percent) or strongly agree that their school cares if they went to school. One in four learners (25 percent) go to school to avoid getting into trouble for not attending.
Figure 41: Extent to which learners agree or disagree with the statement âMy school cares if I go to schoolâ
Both parents and learners are aware of, and influenced by, expectations for attendance. Parents are also highly motivated by their understanding that learning at school was important for their childrenâs future, and for their children to socialise and develop social skills.
Learners themselves are motivated by their parentsâ expectations but are less likely than parents to see their school learning as relevant to their future. Learners are very motivated by getting to spend time with their friends and to have opportunities to do fun things at school. They are more likely to attend if they have good relationships with their teachers and are interested in the things they are learning.
This section highlights how drivers of attendance are different for different learners and different school contexts. We found different drivers of attendance across different learner ages, school decile, rurality, and whether the learner has a disability. We also found different drivers of attendance for those who regularly attend school, and those that do not.
In the last two sections we looked at the different drivers of attendance for MÄori and Pacific learners. This section describes the different drivers of attendance by:
Parents of younger learners are more likely to take their children out of school for both short (54 percent Year 4 to 6, 35 percent Year 11 to 13) and long holidays (37 percent Year 4 to 6, 26 percent Year 11 to 13).
In 2022, more parents of younger learners had taken their child out of school in the last term to go on a whÄnau/family holiday for one or two days (12 percent Year 4 to 6, 5 percent Year 11 to 13).
Parents in the focus groups said that attendance at school for younger age groups is less important than the learning experiences gained on holidays.
âAt primary school, I would take children out of school for life experiencesâ â Parent
âWhen my son was younger I did some holidays, as he has gotten older it is more important he doesnât miss schoolâ â Parent
Figure 64: Percentage of parents of learners across different years who are likely or very likely to keep their child out of school for whÄnau/family holiday of different lengths
Parents of younger learners are more likely than those of older learners to be motivated to send their child to school because school was a fun place to be (88 percent Year 4 to 6, 68 percent Year 11 to 13).
As younger children cannot be left at home alone, parents of younger children are more motivated than parents of older learners to send their child to school so they could do other things, including going to work (58 percent Year 4 to 6, 38 percent Year 11 to 13).
Younger learners are more positive about school and attending school. Younger learners are more likely than older learners (Year 11 to 13) to think:
Younger learners are over twice as likely to want to go to school five days a week compared to older learners (59 percent Year 4 to 6, 25 percent Year 11 to 13).
Figure 65: Percentage of learners across different years who indicated going to school every day is important or very important
Younger learners feel more connected to their school. Younger learners are more likely than older learners to identify wanting to go to school because:
They are also more likely than older learners to agree or strongly agree that:
Other differences in the motivators for younger learners to attend school compared to older learners include:
Younger learners are more likely than older learners to report family commitments as reasons for non-attendance. More younger learners had missed school in the last two weeks because:
Younger learners are more likely to want to miss school because they:
Parents of older learners are more likely to keep their child out of school:
More parents of older children kept their child out of school in the last term because their child had mental health challenges (14 percent Year 11 to 13, 7 percent Year 4 to 6).
Parents of older learners are more likely to keep their child of out of school if their child needed to work in a paid job (10 percent year 11-13, 3 percent year 4-6). This reflects that more learners work when in secondary school.
Older learners are more likely to want to miss school because of a lack of engagement with school.
Older learners are more likely to not want to go to school. They are more likely to:
Older learners are more likely to not be interested in what is taught at school. They are more likely to:
Older learners are more likely to want to miss certain activities. They are more likely to:
Older learners are more likely to and want to do other activities. They are more likely to:
Figure 66: Percentage of learners across different years who want to miss school because they arenât interested or donât like what is taught in school
Older learners are more likely than younger learners to want to miss school because they donât like at least one of their teachers (22 percent Year 11 to 13, 7 percent Year 4 to 6) or they donât like the people in their class (18 percent Year 11 to 13, 8 percent Year 4 to 6).
Older learners are more likely than younger learners to want to go to school because they would get into trouble if they donât go (40 percent Year 11 to 13, 11 percent Year 4 to 6).
Parents of learners in low-decile schools (decile 1 to 3) are more likely than those at high decile schools (decile 8 to 10) to keep their child out of school for:
Parents of learners in low-decile schools face more barriers to attendance due to hardship or lacking resources. Parents of learners in low-decile schools are more likely to keep their child out of school if their child:
Figure 67: Percentages of parents of learners in different decile schools who would be likely or very likely not to send their child to school for reasons associated with financial barriers
Learners in low decile schools are:
Learners in low-decile schools are more likely to want to go to school because they:
Learners in low-decile schools are more likely to agree or strongly agree that:
Figure 68: Percentages of learners in different decile schools who agree or strongly agree with relationship motivators to attend school
Learners in low-decile schools are:
Learners from low-decile schools are:
This is most likely due to lower socio-economic households housing more people and therefore the risk of spreading Covid-19 is greater to these individuals.
Learners from low-decile schools are much more likely to report they do not always have what they need to go to school (for example, uniform, shoes, jacket, lunch) (21 percent in low decile, 9 percent in high decile).
Learners in high decile schools are more likely to want to miss school:
Figure 69: Percentages of learners in different decile schools who want to miss school for reasons associated with lacking motivation
Parents of disabled children are more likely to keep their child out of school:
Figure 70: Percentages of parents of disabled and non-disabled learners who are likely or very likely to keep their child out of school if their child was unable to participate in a school activity
Parents of disabled children reported their child had missed school in the last term because:
Parents of disabled learners are also more likely to keep their child home if:
Disabled learners are more likely to want to miss school because:
Disabled learners are also less likely to be motivated to go to school because they donât get to do activities such as sports and clubs (25 percent of disabled learners, 43 percent of non-disabled learners). They are more likely to not have everything they needed to go to school (19 percent of learners with disabilities compared to 11 percent of learners without disabilities).
Disabled learners are more likely to miss school because they get bullied or picked on (20 percent of disabled learners, 8 percent of non-disabled learners). They are also more likely to have missed school in the last two weeks because they didnât feel like being around their classmates (11 percent of disabled learners, 4 percent of non-disabled learners).
Disabled learners are less likely to:
Figure 71: Percentages of disabled and non-disabled learners who agree or strongly agree that their school cares if they go to school
Rural parents are more likely to:
Figure 72: Percentages of parents from main urban area and rural area who are likely or very likely to keep their child out of school if they go on a whÄnau/family holiday for one or two days
We heard that this was often due to farming commitments not lining up with school holidays, with parents needing to take their children out for family holidays during the term time.
âFamily holiday- it is quiet on the farm during term 1 during schoolâ - Parent
Parents of rural learners were more likely to have kept their child out of school in the last term because transporting their child to school was challenging (8 percent of rural parents, 4 percent main urban parents). This is likely caused by the large distances between homes in rural areas and the nearest school and limited transportation options available in these areas.
Low attenders are more likely to want to miss school because:
The only reason that low attenders identified more than high attenders as a motivation for attending was because they would get into trouble if they donât go (29 percent compared to 21 percent).
High attenders are:
Those with high attendance are more likely to:
Figure 73: Percentages of low and high attenders who want to miss school for reasons associated with prioritising other activities
Figure 74: Percentages of low and high attenders who want to miss school for reasons associated with barriers to attendance
Figure 75: Percentages of high and low attenders who want to go to school for each of the following reasons
Differences within a school What drives the decision to miss school depends on the circumstance of the learner. To see how this happens within a school, we looked at the drivers of non-attendance in one large, single sex mid-decile school. The main motivators for learners to attend this school was getting to spend time with their friends, understand how important school is for their future, liking their teachers and being interested in what is taught in school. However, within this school we found that half the learners did not think attending every day was that important. Like we saw nationally, we found that there are groups of learners within the school that faced barriers to attendance. The most common barriers within the school are:
But there are also a sizeable number of learners who said the following are barriers to attending:
And a small group mentioned:
This local example shows that schools need to a range of strategies to encourage attendance and bring down barriers to attendance. |
There are many different reasons why different groups of learners miss school. Parents of younger learners tend to be more relaxed about their children missing school for holidays and value school for the fun their children have at school, whereas parents of older learners are more inclined to let their children miss school for their wellbeing or to go to work. Younger learners valued school highly and felt connected to their school and teachers. Older learners are more disengaged with school and experienced more social challenges but are more influenced by the prospect of getting into trouble.
Parents of learners in low decile schools experienced many more barriers to attendance such as sickness, bullying, and lacking resources. Learners in low decile schools are more engaged with learning and value school attendance more highly than learners in high decile schools.
Parents of disabled learners experience barriers to their child attending school, including higher levels of bullying.
The barriers and motivators mentioned in this section of the report matter. Learners that attended school regularly have more motivating factors. Learners that do not attend regularly have more barriers.
This section highlights how drivers of attendance are different for different learners and different school contexts. We found different drivers of attendance across different learner ages, school decile, rurality, and whether the learner has a disability. We also found different drivers of attendance for those who regularly attend school, and those that do not.
In the last two sections we looked at the different drivers of attendance for MÄori and Pacific learners. This section describes the different drivers of attendance by:
Parents of younger learners are more likely to take their children out of school for both short (54 percent Year 4 to 6, 35 percent Year 11 to 13) and long holidays (37 percent Year 4 to 6, 26 percent Year 11 to 13).
In 2022, more parents of younger learners had taken their child out of school in the last term to go on a whÄnau/family holiday for one or two days (12 percent Year 4 to 6, 5 percent Year 11 to 13).
Parents in the focus groups said that attendance at school for younger age groups is less important than the learning experiences gained on holidays.
âAt primary school, I would take children out of school for life experiencesâ â Parent
âWhen my son was younger I did some holidays, as he has gotten older it is more important he doesnât miss schoolâ â Parent
Figure 64: Percentage of parents of learners across different years who are likely or very likely to keep their child out of school for whÄnau/family holiday of different lengths
Parents of younger learners are more likely than those of older learners to be motivated to send their child to school because school was a fun place to be (88 percent Year 4 to 6, 68 percent Year 11 to 13).
As younger children cannot be left at home alone, parents of younger children are more motivated than parents of older learners to send their child to school so they could do other things, including going to work (58 percent Year 4 to 6, 38 percent Year 11 to 13).
Younger learners are more positive about school and attending school. Younger learners are more likely than older learners (Year 11 to 13) to think:
Younger learners are over twice as likely to want to go to school five days a week compared to older learners (59 percent Year 4 to 6, 25 percent Year 11 to 13).
Figure 65: Percentage of learners across different years who indicated going to school every day is important or very important
Younger learners feel more connected to their school. Younger learners are more likely than older learners to identify wanting to go to school because:
They are also more likely than older learners to agree or strongly agree that:
Other differences in the motivators for younger learners to attend school compared to older learners include:
Younger learners are more likely than older learners to report family commitments as reasons for non-attendance. More younger learners had missed school in the last two weeks because:
Younger learners are more likely to want to miss school because they:
Parents of older learners are more likely to keep their child out of school:
More parents of older children kept their child out of school in the last term because their child had mental health challenges (14 percent Year 11 to 13, 7 percent Year 4 to 6).
Parents of older learners are more likely to keep their child of out of school if their child needed to work in a paid job (10 percent year 11-13, 3 percent year 4-6). This reflects that more learners work when in secondary school.
Older learners are more likely to want to miss school because of a lack of engagement with school.
Older learners are more likely to not want to go to school. They are more likely to:
Older learners are more likely to not be interested in what is taught at school. They are more likely to:
Older learners are more likely to want to miss certain activities. They are more likely to:
Older learners are more likely to and want to do other activities. They are more likely to:
Figure 66: Percentage of learners across different years who want to miss school because they arenât interested or donât like what is taught in school
Older learners are more likely than younger learners to want to miss school because they donât like at least one of their teachers (22 percent Year 11 to 13, 7 percent Year 4 to 6) or they donât like the people in their class (18 percent Year 11 to 13, 8 percent Year 4 to 6).
Older learners are more likely than younger learners to want to go to school because they would get into trouble if they donât go (40 percent Year 11 to 13, 11 percent Year 4 to 6).
Parents of learners in low-decile schools (decile 1 to 3) are more likely than those at high decile schools (decile 8 to 10) to keep their child out of school for:
Parents of learners in low-decile schools face more barriers to attendance due to hardship or lacking resources. Parents of learners in low-decile schools are more likely to keep their child out of school if their child:
Figure 67: Percentages of parents of learners in different decile schools who would be likely or very likely not to send their child to school for reasons associated with financial barriers
Learners in low decile schools are:
Learners in low-decile schools are more likely to want to go to school because they:
Learners in low-decile schools are more likely to agree or strongly agree that:
Figure 68: Percentages of learners in different decile schools who agree or strongly agree with relationship motivators to attend school
Learners in low-decile schools are:
Learners from low-decile schools are:
This is most likely due to lower socio-economic households housing more people and therefore the risk of spreading Covid-19 is greater to these individuals.
Learners from low-decile schools are much more likely to report they do not always have what they need to go to school (for example, uniform, shoes, jacket, lunch) (21 percent in low decile, 9 percent in high decile).
Learners in high decile schools are more likely to want to miss school:
Figure 69: Percentages of learners in different decile schools who want to miss school for reasons associated with lacking motivation
Parents of disabled children are more likely to keep their child out of school:
Figure 70: Percentages of parents of disabled and non-disabled learners who are likely or very likely to keep their child out of school if their child was unable to participate in a school activity
Parents of disabled children reported their child had missed school in the last term because:
Parents of disabled learners are also more likely to keep their child home if:
Disabled learners are more likely to want to miss school because:
Disabled learners are also less likely to be motivated to go to school because they donât get to do activities such as sports and clubs (25 percent of disabled learners, 43 percent of non-disabled learners). They are more likely to not have everything they needed to go to school (19 percent of learners with disabilities compared to 11 percent of learners without disabilities).
Disabled learners are more likely to miss school because they get bullied or picked on (20 percent of disabled learners, 8 percent of non-disabled learners). They are also more likely to have missed school in the last two weeks because they didnât feel like being around their classmates (11 percent of disabled learners, 4 percent of non-disabled learners).
Disabled learners are less likely to:
Figure 71: Percentages of disabled and non-disabled learners who agree or strongly agree that their school cares if they go to school
Rural parents are more likely to:
Figure 72: Percentages of parents from main urban area and rural area who are likely or very likely to keep their child out of school if they go on a whÄnau/family holiday for one or two days
We heard that this was often due to farming commitments not lining up with school holidays, with parents needing to take their children out for family holidays during the term time.
âFamily holiday- it is quiet on the farm during term 1 during schoolâ - Parent
Parents of rural learners were more likely to have kept their child out of school in the last term because transporting their child to school was challenging (8 percent of rural parents, 4 percent main urban parents). This is likely caused by the large distances between homes in rural areas and the nearest school and limited transportation options available in these areas.
Low attenders are more likely to want to miss school because:
The only reason that low attenders identified more than high attenders as a motivation for attending was because they would get into trouble if they donât go (29 percent compared to 21 percent).
High attenders are:
Those with high attendance are more likely to:
Figure 73: Percentages of low and high attenders who want to miss school for reasons associated with prioritising other activities
Figure 74: Percentages of low and high attenders who want to miss school for reasons associated with barriers to attendance
Figure 75: Percentages of high and low attenders who want to go to school for each of the following reasons
Differences within a school What drives the decision to miss school depends on the circumstance of the learner. To see how this happens within a school, we looked at the drivers of non-attendance in one large, single sex mid-decile school. The main motivators for learners to attend this school was getting to spend time with their friends, understand how important school is for their future, liking their teachers and being interested in what is taught in school. However, within this school we found that half the learners did not think attending every day was that important. Like we saw nationally, we found that there are groups of learners within the school that faced barriers to attendance. The most common barriers within the school are:
But there are also a sizeable number of learners who said the following are barriers to attending:
And a small group mentioned:
This local example shows that schools need to a range of strategies to encourage attendance and bring down barriers to attendance. |
There are many different reasons why different groups of learners miss school. Parents of younger learners tend to be more relaxed about their children missing school for holidays and value school for the fun their children have at school, whereas parents of older learners are more inclined to let their children miss school for their wellbeing or to go to work. Younger learners valued school highly and felt connected to their school and teachers. Older learners are more disengaged with school and experienced more social challenges but are more influenced by the prospect of getting into trouble.
Parents of learners in low decile schools experienced many more barriers to attendance such as sickness, bullying, and lacking resources. Learners in low decile schools are more engaged with learning and value school attendance more highly than learners in high decile schools.
Parents of disabled learners experience barriers to their child attending school, including higher levels of bullying.
The barriers and motivators mentioned in this section of the report matter. Learners that attended school regularly have more motivating factors. Learners that do not attend regularly have more barriers.
Schools or parents canât improve attendance alone. Learner, family, school, and community factors all impact on attendance. Action is needed by government, communities, schools, parents, and learners for attendance in Aotearoa New Zealand to improve. Â
This report has found that:
Based on these findings, as well as what learners, parents and schools have told us will help, and examples of good practice, this section identifies five areas to help improve attendance.
Area 1: Increase understanding of the importance of attendance (and education).
Area 2: Increase school, learner, and parent awareness of how often learners are attending school.
Area 3: Make what and how learners learn more engaging and support them to catch up.
Area 4: Make school a great place to be.
Area 5: Tackle barriers to attendance.
Too many parents are comfortable with their child not attending school and too many learners are comfortable with not attending school. Every day of non-attendance has a negative impact on learning and achievement. Increasing the understanding of the importance of attendance and education is critical to changing this attitude.
Learners told us that greater school and parent expectations for attendance would motivate them to attend school. Our findings showed that learners are more likely to value school and attendance if their school and their parents cared that they attended.
âMaybe if they got more encouragement from the school/ parents/caregiversâ â Secondary learner
Parents told us they want clearer, more consistent messages about regular school attendance, including messages on the importance of attendance and the risks of irregular attendance.
âA lot falls on parents, parents need to see the value and see that attendance impacts learning. Recognizing the detrimental effect of not being there. Parentsâ understanding is so important. Reading the 90 percent statistics - 10 percent absence is a month away a year. That kind of information is powerful. Educating parents so they in turn donât take the easy way out for their kids. This will ultimately change childrenâs attitudes.â - Parent
âI believe they should be going to school. We are an immunocompromised family. I was worried about that. Secondary schools arenât providing enough feedback. Communication is lacking.â - Parent
Schools told us they know that they need to reset expectations for regular school attendance with their school communities. They said that national messaging would support them to do this.
âThere needs to be a national promotion of attending school so that parents see it everywhere. As a kÄhui ako we are looking at doing somethingâ â School leader
âParents do take note of messages from Ministry - more of the messaging that says that school is a safe place to be - positive messaging; to counter the misinformation that is circulating. It works.ââ School leader
âThere is a need to have a refocus on attendance as a school and communityâ â School leader
Practice example: Working together to set an expectation of school attendance Concerned about the level of attendance across their schools, Northland schools have joined together to send a unified message about the importance of school attendance. Letâs Get to School Tai Tokerau| I Te Tai Tokerau â Hoake tatou ki te kura involved 150 schools in Northland receiving a social media kit containing posters, graphics, and key messages to use on their Facebook pages and websites. The initiative has received funding and support from the regional office of the Ministry of Education. President of the Te Tai Tokerau Principalsâ Association Pat Newman said the collaboration came about after realising that lack of attendance at school was an issue that all schools were facing and that they could have a stronger response if they pooled resources and acted collectively. He said the campaign was designed to focus on the positive reasons for attending school from learnersâ perspectives and in learnersâ words. âThe emphasis is on what learners enjoy about school and to raise awareness of what they might be missing out on by not being at school.ââ One month following the launch of the campaign Ministry attendance data showed a near 2 percent rise in the percentage of learners attending school in the region. This equates to nearly 500 more learners attending school. |
Practice example: All in for learning |Kia Kotahi te ō ki te ako In response to the decline in regular attendance, the Ministry of Education has developed and released an attendance and engagement strategy called All in for learning |Kia kotahi te ō ki te ako26. The strategy sets targets to raise regular attendance levels to 75 percent by 2026. The strategy has five priorities for the Ministry and schools:
In addition, in August 2022, the Ministry launched a national communications campaign aimed at promoting regular school attendance called Every school day is a big day. |
RecommendationsTo improve understanding of the importance of regular attendance we recommend the following actions.
|
Despite having the same expectations for school attendance as other countries (90 percent), a lower proportion of learners attend school regularly in Aotearoa New Zealand than United Kingdom, Ireland, Canada, the United States, and Australia.
From our focus groups and interviews with schools we found that schools have systems that communicate attendance to parents. However, these tools and systems require proactive parents or provide the information too late for parents to support learners to make changes. Many schools publish attendance data on web portals that parents have to look up, or in school reports at the end of term.Â
Not all schools have systems that look at attendance patterns. In addition to this, not all schools know about how often individual learners are attending, which learners have worrying levels of attendance, and how many learners have worrying levels of attendance.
Schools also have variable expectations for regular attendance â some told us they encourage a regular attendance rate less than 90 percent. Most schools follow up on moderate (70 to 80 percent attendance) and chronic non-attendance (less than 70 percent attendance). This means that many learners and their parents may not be aware when they are falling into irregular absence (80 to 90 percent).Â
Learners told us that more prompts can help motivate them to attend. For example, for learners in one school, regular attendance is required to gain a junior diploma. Tutor teachers talked to learners frequently about the importance of regular attendance and show them how to track their attendance using the schoolâs online learner portal.
Parents told us they want more communication from schools about their childâs attendance.
âMore communication. A mid-year report and end of year report is too late to change habits or results. We need more feedback about how things are going.â â Parent
âSupport for learners, especially at this time due to the disruptions of COVID. Schools are really stretched. They donât always get the message out when learners arenât there. They need to work more closely with the parents and community about why they arenât attending, how can we help the kids.ââ - Parents
We saw the following practices that support awareness of attendance levels:
âWe get a lot of attendance data. Weekly we look at attendance for each year level. It is shared with the DP (deputy principal), deans and ako teachers for year level and communication goes home. Subject teachers, ako teacher and dean may contact home or can escalate to DPâ - School leader
Practice example: Change in attendance monitoring drives improvements The leader of a primary school was shocked when the school changed from monitoring and setting goals for attendance using the average across all the learners to the proportion of learners attending 90 percent of the time.  âBefore 2019 we were very proud of our high attendance rate â we sat at 90 percent. Then as a KÄhui Ako we started looking the proportion of learners attending 90 percent of the time. We did an inquiry and found that only 48 percent of our learners were attending regularly.â The leader initiated a school-wide inquiry into the drivers of attendance, with a focus on raising awareness of attendance amongst parents and learners. âIn every whÄnau hui we talked about attendance rates. In our newsletter and through our parent portal â so that parents knew about the importance of 90 percent attendance.â âThe guts of it was that most of our parents didnât track their childâs attendance and we wanted to change thatâ. At the same time the school trialled recognising regular attendance with a certificate for learners. This was well received by learners and parents, and contributed to raised awareness levels of attendance across the school. |
Recommendations:To improve awareness of how often learners are attending school, we recommend the following actions.
|
A group of learners are not finding school engaging. Just under one in five learners are not interested in what is being taught at school or want to avoid certain school activities. MÄori learners and disabled learners are less likely to want to go to school because curriculum, teaching, and learning are preparing them for the future.
A number of school leaders agreed that schools face the ongoing challenge of making teaching and learning more personalised, engaging, and relevant.
Learners told us they want a more engaging and relevant school curriculum â linked to life skills and their aspirations.
âMake subjects more relevant to life skills you needâ - Learner
âBe able to pick more subjects at a younger age â having more subject choicesâ - Learner
âMake learning not so boring â for example have more practical based workâ - Learner
They also want teachers to use a variety of teaching approaches and adapt for different learning styles.
âTeachers taking more time to explain things and help us out â sometimes they just give the work to us and say it is all there â but we are waiting for them to show usâ - Learner
âThey expect us to learn how they want to teach us.â - Learner
âLess taking notes and then tests. They need to break it up with fun/interactive things. More variety in class.â - Learner
Parents also told us they want schools to provide a more engaging and relevant curriculum.
âMore of the life skills learning opposed to academic stuff. Would enhance school. Relevant life experience stuffâ -Â Parent
âA curriculum that is more targeted at what kids actually love to do â what they are interested in. Some are not the best at maths, English or science. So do a focus group to understand what the kids are really good at and help grow thatâ. - Parent
Schools told us that the onus is on them to design and provide an engaging and relevant curriculum and to ensure learners experience effective teaching.
âSolutions have to come from schools changing the way we approach curriculum content and delivery. I donât think we can depend on learners to intrinsically see the value of education â we have to make them want to come.â - School leader
âFirst we have to provide a rich, robust high knowledge, engaging curriculum.â- School leader
Practice example: Maximising opportunities to learn  The principal of a low decile high school was aware of the social and economic pressures on the learners in his school and their families and whÄnau. He focused on building a culture of care in his school that recognised that every day at school matters. The schoolâs strategies included a focus on positive relationships, high expectations, meeting social needs, and attending to learnersâ learning needs when they were at school. âWe focused on the principle that âwhen they turn up to class â I am ready to teach themâ. This led to a change of attitude from âoh you turned up â you are so far behindâ to âyouâre here and this is what we are going to do and where we are going to get toââ.  |
Recommendations:To make learning more engaging we recommend the following actions.
|
Both parents and learners value the opportunities school provides for learners to develop social skills and socialise with friends. Positive relationships with teachers also motivate learners to attend school.
Bullying puts off four in 10 parents from requiring their child to attend school. Bullying also impacts one in 10 learnersâ school attendance. Negative social interactions with peers and teachers also put learners off attending school. MÄori and Pacific parents are especially concerned about schoolsâ social and emotional environments. Re-enforcing the importance of implementing Ka Hikitia, the Action Plan for Pacific Education and the NELPâs requirements that schools are fostering inclusive school cultures that ensure all learners and their whÄnau and families are free of racism and discrimination.57,58,59
Learners told us schools can do more to promote a safe and positive social environment by improving responses to bullying, support for mental health, interactions with teachers, and addressing racism and discrimination.
âA safe school environment. More senior learners and teachers in a specific safe space to help with bullyingâ - Learner
âLearners would go to school more often if there were actually GOOD support systems there for them, and if their mental health issues were taken seriously by the school and their parents.â - Learner
âTeachers could be more reasonable when you make a mistake. They assume you will be trouble if you have done one thing wrong. They give up on kids too easilyâ - Learner
âTreat everyone the same â no matter their ethnicityâ - Learner
Secondary-aged learners are frustrated with some traditional school practices including start times, seating plans, uniforms, and compulsory subject choices/activities.
âMake some activities optional â donât force learners to do things they arenât comfortable doingâ - Learner
âMore freedom in class- no seating plan by defaultâ - Learner
âIf school started later you would have less people sleeping in and people that live far away would have more time to get to schoolâ - Learner
âGive us more independence â more like uni. Especially if we are getting the work doneâ. - Learner
Parents also think safe social environments and support for learnersâ social and emotional skills is key to supporting attendance.Â
âAn immediate issue learners are facing - bullying. MoE and schools need to be looking at this. There is a lot that needs to be done to stop this.â - Parent
âKids feeling more supported at school. Teachers are really stretched but being in bigger classrooms with a lot of learners can cause learner to not engage with teachers or learning.â - ParentÂ
âIdentify earlier those learners that arenât engaging in learning and find out why. Are they having any issues. Children are dealing with a lot these days. Not letting them get lost in a big group. Knowing that my child is supported at school takes the pressure off meâ - Parent
Schools also identified that provision of a safe social and emotional learning environment is a foundation for encouraging attendance.
âA safe environment at school â if kids feel good theyâll come. A positive, safe learning environment. Somewhere they feel they are having their needs met â and a purpose to be here. If they feel there is no support, not listened to or respected â than they wonât want to comeâ - Teacher
âWe run mentor groups of no more than 15 learners â so it is very visible when learners are not there. Itâs about very strongly saying âI care about you â I care that you come to school.ââ - School leader
Practice example: Social skills training The SENCO in this contributing primary school was concerned about increased levels of anxiety amongst parents and learners. This was leading to more learners staying home from school to avoid certain activities or stressors. The school participated in a pilot programme with the local Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service to deliver a resiliency programme called âKia Maiaâ (Be Brave). The programme taught strategies to manage anxiety. The programme was delivered to small groups of six to eight learners and the school saw good results with programme participants increasingly able to manage anxiety at school without going or staying home. The school continued delivering the programme beyond the pilot. The SENCO believes an important part of the programmeâs success was that it gave parents confidence that the school knows about their childâs anxiety and is providing appropriate support. |
Recommendations:To make school a great place to be we recommend the following actions.
|
A range of barriers lead parents to decide to keep their child at home, or learners to decide not to attend school. Schools and parents told us they cannot address the many barriers to attendance alone.
Learners told us they want more help with and more understanding about the barriers they face in attending school.
âSome people don't have the money for bus fares, making it easier for learners to get to school will help. Also during winter when it is cold, some might stay home because they can't afford the proper school uniform and are not allowed to wear other warm clothes. Stopping the over-policing of uniform can help this, if not making uniforms cheaper, and more size inclusive.â - Learner
âFood, understanding about why a learner may not have correct uniform, decent teaching for less able learners, kindness towards learnersâ - Learner
âFree lunches in all schools...I know a lot of people go without lunchâ - Learner
âMore transportation to get to school, free transport optionsâ - Learner
Parents also want more support for families struggling to overcome barriers to school attendance.
âThere are people that struggle to fill a lunch box, and I know theyâve been bringing in lunch in schools. Both my boys went to counselling â they were always during school time. If that was within school time then they wouldnât have to take a half day off school. When I was sick I couldnât get kids to school, transport would be a huge help.â - Parent
âThe cost of uniforms. If they are not dry or ready for the next day â the kids donât want to go in the wrong pants or shoes. It would be cool if that was cheaper or subsidised.â - Parent
âHelp with transport â that would save me $40 to $50 a week. School provides lunches. Seeing an increase in learners going to school because they are being fed. A square meal makes them feel better about themselves.â - Parent
âif we had a better school bus network here would be a huge benefit. With the drug issues and domestic violence here â if the kid can get on the bus with their friends then they might do that â even without a uniform and lunch.â - Parent
âI can understand why kids would have to stay home and look after siblings. Childcare can exceed wage. Parents donât have enough choices. A lot of people donât have a village or a community to helpâ. - Parent  Â
Schools told us some of the barriers to attendance are not able to be addressed by school, and they needed the support of government and communities. Existing national programmes to reduce barriers, such as free lunches, free period products, Social workers in Schools, are making a difference.
âWe would benefit from an attendance service â with the ability to form relationships with whÄnau and in the community â to door knock â we canât afford that. Need to build understanding of the why behind non-attendance â there are huge things around trauma. We need counsellors, psychologists â the need for intensive care and work â many cases are beyond the capability of schools. We need people to support us.â - School leader
âwe have the period products, the free lunches â they are reducing barriers. We spend lots of money buying clothing as well.â - School leader
âWe already have breakfast club. Free lunch definitely helps for some. We donât have a uniform â which may or may not help. Safe transport is quite a big one. We are just in the early stages of setting up an attendance service â getting the processes rolling. Oranga Tamariki and Social Workers in School has picked up some of the wrap around support for vulnerable families â schools canât offer some of the social stuff that is needed to wrap around.â - School leader
Practice example: Meeting individual needs by removing barriers The principal of a primary school in a small town credits strong community connections and knowledge of school families as key to addressing attendance concerns. âOur region can be very wet, sometimes if children donât have umbrellas, gumboots and coats they wonât comeâ. The school has worked closely with local churches and charities to fund wet weather gear as a way of removing this barrier to attending. âWe know our families and their needs. An example is we have a local single-parent family struggling with transport to school. One of the children is already at school and the other is about to transition. So we pick up the whole family, bring the older child to school and drop the younger one to kindergarten. Itâs just what we do here.â |
Recommendations:To tackle barriers to attendance we recommend:
|
Improving attendance in Aotearoa New Zealand requires action from everybody. It requires government agencies, including the Ministry of Education, to communicate the importance of attendance and set clear expectations to the community and to the families (including those that social agencies are working with).
Improving attendance requires schools to more proactively manage regular non-attendance, and to let parents know early when learners are missing school regularly. Schools need to make learning more engaging, teach the relevance and value of all learning, and make catch-up material available for learners who have missed learning.
It requires parents to set expectations for school attendance, and to work with schools to either overcome or find other ways to deal with issues that lead to non-attendance. Parents also need to support their learner to catch up on missed learning, either during school holidays, weekends or after school.
It requires learners to work with the school and their parents, to find ways to deal with issues that arise within the school. It also requires learners to take agency over their learning â and decide that attendance and doing well in school is important.
Regular attendance at school is critical to achievement and Aotearoa New Zealandâs future. We need to act now to change the trend of declining attendance.
Schools or parents canât improve attendance alone. Learner, family, school, and community factors all impact on attendance. Action is needed by government, communities, schools, parents, and learners for attendance in Aotearoa New Zealand to improve. Â
This report has found that:
Based on these findings, as well as what learners, parents and schools have told us will help, and examples of good practice, this section identifies five areas to help improve attendance.
Area 1: Increase understanding of the importance of attendance (and education).
Area 2: Increase school, learner, and parent awareness of how often learners are attending school.
Area 3: Make what and how learners learn more engaging and support them to catch up.
Area 4: Make school a great place to be.
Area 5: Tackle barriers to attendance.
Too many parents are comfortable with their child not attending school and too many learners are comfortable with not attending school. Every day of non-attendance has a negative impact on learning and achievement. Increasing the understanding of the importance of attendance and education is critical to changing this attitude.
Learners told us that greater school and parent expectations for attendance would motivate them to attend school. Our findings showed that learners are more likely to value school and attendance if their school and their parents cared that they attended.
âMaybe if they got more encouragement from the school/ parents/caregiversâ â Secondary learner
Parents told us they want clearer, more consistent messages about regular school attendance, including messages on the importance of attendance and the risks of irregular attendance.
âA lot falls on parents, parents need to see the value and see that attendance impacts learning. Recognizing the detrimental effect of not being there. Parentsâ understanding is so important. Reading the 90 percent statistics - 10 percent absence is a month away a year. That kind of information is powerful. Educating parents so they in turn donât take the easy way out for their kids. This will ultimately change childrenâs attitudes.â - Parent
âI believe they should be going to school. We are an immunocompromised family. I was worried about that. Secondary schools arenât providing enough feedback. Communication is lacking.â - Parent
Schools told us they know that they need to reset expectations for regular school attendance with their school communities. They said that national messaging would support them to do this.
âThere needs to be a national promotion of attending school so that parents see it everywhere. As a kÄhui ako we are looking at doing somethingâ â School leader
âParents do take note of messages from Ministry - more of the messaging that says that school is a safe place to be - positive messaging; to counter the misinformation that is circulating. It works.ââ School leader
âThere is a need to have a refocus on attendance as a school and communityâ â School leader
Practice example: Working together to set an expectation of school attendance Concerned about the level of attendance across their schools, Northland schools have joined together to send a unified message about the importance of school attendance. Letâs Get to School Tai Tokerau| I Te Tai Tokerau â Hoake tatou ki te kura involved 150 schools in Northland receiving a social media kit containing posters, graphics, and key messages to use on their Facebook pages and websites. The initiative has received funding and support from the regional office of the Ministry of Education. President of the Te Tai Tokerau Principalsâ Association Pat Newman said the collaboration came about after realising that lack of attendance at school was an issue that all schools were facing and that they could have a stronger response if they pooled resources and acted collectively. He said the campaign was designed to focus on the positive reasons for attending school from learnersâ perspectives and in learnersâ words. âThe emphasis is on what learners enjoy about school and to raise awareness of what they might be missing out on by not being at school.ââ One month following the launch of the campaign Ministry attendance data showed a near 2 percent rise in the percentage of learners attending school in the region. This equates to nearly 500 more learners attending school. |
Practice example: All in for learning |Kia Kotahi te ō ki te ako In response to the decline in regular attendance, the Ministry of Education has developed and released an attendance and engagement strategy called All in for learning |Kia kotahi te ō ki te ako26. The strategy sets targets to raise regular attendance levels to 75 percent by 2026. The strategy has five priorities for the Ministry and schools:
In addition, in August 2022, the Ministry launched a national communications campaign aimed at promoting regular school attendance called Every school day is a big day. |
RecommendationsTo improve understanding of the importance of regular attendance we recommend the following actions.
|
Despite having the same expectations for school attendance as other countries (90 percent), a lower proportion of learners attend school regularly in Aotearoa New Zealand than United Kingdom, Ireland, Canada, the United States, and Australia.
From our focus groups and interviews with schools we found that schools have systems that communicate attendance to parents. However, these tools and systems require proactive parents or provide the information too late for parents to support learners to make changes. Many schools publish attendance data on web portals that parents have to look up, or in school reports at the end of term.Â
Not all schools have systems that look at attendance patterns. In addition to this, not all schools know about how often individual learners are attending, which learners have worrying levels of attendance, and how many learners have worrying levels of attendance.
Schools also have variable expectations for regular attendance â some told us they encourage a regular attendance rate less than 90 percent. Most schools follow up on moderate (70 to 80 percent attendance) and chronic non-attendance (less than 70 percent attendance). This means that many learners and their parents may not be aware when they are falling into irregular absence (80 to 90 percent).Â
Learners told us that more prompts can help motivate them to attend. For example, for learners in one school, regular attendance is required to gain a junior diploma. Tutor teachers talked to learners frequently about the importance of regular attendance and show them how to track their attendance using the schoolâs online learner portal.
Parents told us they want more communication from schools about their childâs attendance.
âMore communication. A mid-year report and end of year report is too late to change habits or results. We need more feedback about how things are going.â â Parent
âSupport for learners, especially at this time due to the disruptions of COVID. Schools are really stretched. They donât always get the message out when learners arenât there. They need to work more closely with the parents and community about why they arenât attending, how can we help the kids.ââ - Parents
We saw the following practices that support awareness of attendance levels:
âWe get a lot of attendance data. Weekly we look at attendance for each year level. It is shared with the DP (deputy principal), deans and ako teachers for year level and communication goes home. Subject teachers, ako teacher and dean may contact home or can escalate to DPâ - School leader
Practice example: Change in attendance monitoring drives improvements The leader of a primary school was shocked when the school changed from monitoring and setting goals for attendance using the average across all the learners to the proportion of learners attending 90 percent of the time.  âBefore 2019 we were very proud of our high attendance rate â we sat at 90 percent. Then as a KÄhui Ako we started looking the proportion of learners attending 90 percent of the time. We did an inquiry and found that only 48 percent of our learners were attending regularly.â The leader initiated a school-wide inquiry into the drivers of attendance, with a focus on raising awareness of attendance amongst parents and learners. âIn every whÄnau hui we talked about attendance rates. In our newsletter and through our parent portal â so that parents knew about the importance of 90 percent attendance.â âThe guts of it was that most of our parents didnât track their childâs attendance and we wanted to change thatâ. At the same time the school trialled recognising regular attendance with a certificate for learners. This was well received by learners and parents, and contributed to raised awareness levels of attendance across the school. |
Recommendations:To improve awareness of how often learners are attending school, we recommend the following actions.
|
A group of learners are not finding school engaging. Just under one in five learners are not interested in what is being taught at school or want to avoid certain school activities. MÄori learners and disabled learners are less likely to want to go to school because curriculum, teaching, and learning are preparing them for the future.
A number of school leaders agreed that schools face the ongoing challenge of making teaching and learning more personalised, engaging, and relevant.
Learners told us they want a more engaging and relevant school curriculum â linked to life skills and their aspirations.
âMake subjects more relevant to life skills you needâ - Learner
âBe able to pick more subjects at a younger age â having more subject choicesâ - Learner
âMake learning not so boring â for example have more practical based workâ - Learner
They also want teachers to use a variety of teaching approaches and adapt for different learning styles.
âTeachers taking more time to explain things and help us out â sometimes they just give the work to us and say it is all there â but we are waiting for them to show usâ - Learner
âThey expect us to learn how they want to teach us.â - Learner
âLess taking notes and then tests. They need to break it up with fun/interactive things. More variety in class.â - Learner
Parents also told us they want schools to provide a more engaging and relevant curriculum.
âMore of the life skills learning opposed to academic stuff. Would enhance school. Relevant life experience stuffâ -Â Parent
âA curriculum that is more targeted at what kids actually love to do â what they are interested in. Some are not the best at maths, English or science. So do a focus group to understand what the kids are really good at and help grow thatâ. - Parent
Schools told us that the onus is on them to design and provide an engaging and relevant curriculum and to ensure learners experience effective teaching.
âSolutions have to come from schools changing the way we approach curriculum content and delivery. I donât think we can depend on learners to intrinsically see the value of education â we have to make them want to come.â - School leader
âFirst we have to provide a rich, robust high knowledge, engaging curriculum.â- School leader
Practice example: Maximising opportunities to learn  The principal of a low decile high school was aware of the social and economic pressures on the learners in his school and their families and whÄnau. He focused on building a culture of care in his school that recognised that every day at school matters. The schoolâs strategies included a focus on positive relationships, high expectations, meeting social needs, and attending to learnersâ learning needs when they were at school. âWe focused on the principle that âwhen they turn up to class â I am ready to teach themâ. This led to a change of attitude from âoh you turned up â you are so far behindâ to âyouâre here and this is what we are going to do and where we are going to get toââ.  |
Recommendations:To make learning more engaging we recommend the following actions.
|
Both parents and learners value the opportunities school provides for learners to develop social skills and socialise with friends. Positive relationships with teachers also motivate learners to attend school.
Bullying puts off four in 10 parents from requiring their child to attend school. Bullying also impacts one in 10 learnersâ school attendance. Negative social interactions with peers and teachers also put learners off attending school. MÄori and Pacific parents are especially concerned about schoolsâ social and emotional environments. Re-enforcing the importance of implementing Ka Hikitia, the Action Plan for Pacific Education and the NELPâs requirements that schools are fostering inclusive school cultures that ensure all learners and their whÄnau and families are free of racism and discrimination.57,58,59
Learners told us schools can do more to promote a safe and positive social environment by improving responses to bullying, support for mental health, interactions with teachers, and addressing racism and discrimination.
âA safe school environment. More senior learners and teachers in a specific safe space to help with bullyingâ - Learner
âLearners would go to school more often if there were actually GOOD support systems there for them, and if their mental health issues were taken seriously by the school and their parents.â - Learner
âTeachers could be more reasonable when you make a mistake. They assume you will be trouble if you have done one thing wrong. They give up on kids too easilyâ - Learner
âTreat everyone the same â no matter their ethnicityâ - Learner
Secondary-aged learners are frustrated with some traditional school practices including start times, seating plans, uniforms, and compulsory subject choices/activities.
âMake some activities optional â donât force learners to do things they arenât comfortable doingâ - Learner
âMore freedom in class- no seating plan by defaultâ - Learner
âIf school started later you would have less people sleeping in and people that live far away would have more time to get to schoolâ - Learner
âGive us more independence â more like uni. Especially if we are getting the work doneâ. - Learner
Parents also think safe social environments and support for learnersâ social and emotional skills is key to supporting attendance.Â
âAn immediate issue learners are facing - bullying. MoE and schools need to be looking at this. There is a lot that needs to be done to stop this.â - Parent
âKids feeling more supported at school. Teachers are really stretched but being in bigger classrooms with a lot of learners can cause learner to not engage with teachers or learning.â - ParentÂ
âIdentify earlier those learners that arenât engaging in learning and find out why. Are they having any issues. Children are dealing with a lot these days. Not letting them get lost in a big group. Knowing that my child is supported at school takes the pressure off meâ - Parent
Schools also identified that provision of a safe social and emotional learning environment is a foundation for encouraging attendance.
âA safe environment at school â if kids feel good theyâll come. A positive, safe learning environment. Somewhere they feel they are having their needs met â and a purpose to be here. If they feel there is no support, not listened to or respected â than they wonât want to comeâ - Teacher
âWe run mentor groups of no more than 15 learners â so it is very visible when learners are not there. Itâs about very strongly saying âI care about you â I care that you come to school.ââ - School leader
Practice example: Social skills training The SENCO in this contributing primary school was concerned about increased levels of anxiety amongst parents and learners. This was leading to more learners staying home from school to avoid certain activities or stressors. The school participated in a pilot programme with the local Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service to deliver a resiliency programme called âKia Maiaâ (Be Brave). The programme taught strategies to manage anxiety. The programme was delivered to small groups of six to eight learners and the school saw good results with programme participants increasingly able to manage anxiety at school without going or staying home. The school continued delivering the programme beyond the pilot. The SENCO believes an important part of the programmeâs success was that it gave parents confidence that the school knows about their childâs anxiety and is providing appropriate support. |
Recommendations:To make school a great place to be we recommend the following actions.
|
A range of barriers lead parents to decide to keep their child at home, or learners to decide not to attend school. Schools and parents told us they cannot address the many barriers to attendance alone.
Learners told us they want more help with and more understanding about the barriers they face in attending school.
âSome people don't have the money for bus fares, making it easier for learners to get to school will help. Also during winter when it is cold, some might stay home because they can't afford the proper school uniform and are not allowed to wear other warm clothes. Stopping the over-policing of uniform can help this, if not making uniforms cheaper, and more size inclusive.â - Learner
âFood, understanding about why a learner may not have correct uniform, decent teaching for less able learners, kindness towards learnersâ - Learner
âFree lunches in all schools...I know a lot of people go without lunchâ - Learner
âMore transportation to get to school, free transport optionsâ - Learner
Parents also want more support for families struggling to overcome barriers to school attendance.
âThere are people that struggle to fill a lunch box, and I know theyâve been bringing in lunch in schools. Both my boys went to counselling â they were always during school time. If that was within school time then they wouldnât have to take a half day off school. When I was sick I couldnât get kids to school, transport would be a huge help.â - Parent
âThe cost of uniforms. If they are not dry or ready for the next day â the kids donât want to go in the wrong pants or shoes. It would be cool if that was cheaper or subsidised.â - Parent
âHelp with transport â that would save me $40 to $50 a week. School provides lunches. Seeing an increase in learners going to school because they are being fed. A square meal makes them feel better about themselves.â - Parent
âif we had a better school bus network here would be a huge benefit. With the drug issues and domestic violence here â if the kid can get on the bus with their friends then they might do that â even without a uniform and lunch.â - Parent
âI can understand why kids would have to stay home and look after siblings. Childcare can exceed wage. Parents donât have enough choices. A lot of people donât have a village or a community to helpâ. - Parent  Â
Schools told us some of the barriers to attendance are not able to be addressed by school, and they needed the support of government and communities. Existing national programmes to reduce barriers, such as free lunches, free period products, Social workers in Schools, are making a difference.
âWe would benefit from an attendance service â with the ability to form relationships with whÄnau and in the community â to door knock â we canât afford that. Need to build understanding of the why behind non-attendance â there are huge things around trauma. We need counsellors, psychologists â the need for intensive care and work â many cases are beyond the capability of schools. We need people to support us.â - School leader
âwe have the period products, the free lunches â they are reducing barriers. We spend lots of money buying clothing as well.â - School leader
âWe already have breakfast club. Free lunch definitely helps for some. We donât have a uniform â which may or may not help. Safe transport is quite a big one. We are just in the early stages of setting up an attendance service â getting the processes rolling. Oranga Tamariki and Social Workers in School has picked up some of the wrap around support for vulnerable families â schools canât offer some of the social stuff that is needed to wrap around.â - School leader
Practice example: Meeting individual needs by removing barriers The principal of a primary school in a small town credits strong community connections and knowledge of school families as key to addressing attendance concerns. âOur region can be very wet, sometimes if children donât have umbrellas, gumboots and coats they wonât comeâ. The school has worked closely with local churches and charities to fund wet weather gear as a way of removing this barrier to attending. âWe know our families and their needs. An example is we have a local single-parent family struggling with transport to school. One of the children is already at school and the other is about to transition. So we pick up the whole family, bring the older child to school and drop the younger one to kindergarten. Itâs just what we do here.â |
Recommendations:To tackle barriers to attendance we recommend:
|
Improving attendance in Aotearoa New Zealand requires action from everybody. It requires government agencies, including the Ministry of Education, to communicate the importance of attendance and set clear expectations to the community and to the families (including those that social agencies are working with).
Improving attendance requires schools to more proactively manage regular non-attendance, and to let parents know early when learners are missing school regularly. Schools need to make learning more engaging, teach the relevance and value of all learning, and make catch-up material available for learners who have missed learning.
It requires parents to set expectations for school attendance, and to work with schools to either overcome or find other ways to deal with issues that lead to non-attendance. Parents also need to support their learner to catch up on missed learning, either during school holidays, weekends or after school.
It requires learners to work with the school and their parents, to find ways to deal with issues that arise within the school. It also requires learners to take agency over their learning â and decide that attendance and doing well in school is important.
Regular attendance at school is critical to achievement and Aotearoa New Zealandâs future. We need to act now to change the trend of declining attendance.
ERO used a mixed method approach of surveys, focus groups and interviews. This report draws on student, parent, and school voices to understand the reason why students miss or go to school.
ERO used a mixed method approach for the data collection for this report. We collected both qualitative and quantitative data. The target population were English medium schools in New Zealand. Data was collected through surveys and focus groups, of students and parents, and interviews with teachers and school leaders.
Quantitative data were statistically analysed using STATA and Excel software. Meaningful differences between groups were identified by the magnitude of differences in percentages between groups. We looked for differences where: there was a greater than seven percentage points differences, where one group responded to a question at twice the rate of another group (for lower percentages) or where a difference meaningfully explained a particular factor. Non-responses and âdonât knowâ responses were excluded from response totals when calculating percentages.
Qualitative data were thematically analysed by an experienced team.
ERO conducted the student survey using Survey Monkey. The student survey was in the field from 23rd of June 2022 to 18th of August 2022 (spanning parts of both term 2 and term 3). We invited a random sample of 400 schools to participate in our survey, excluding schools that ERO had recently contacted for other surveys. Schools were sent the survey link in an email and invited to pass this on to their students. 48 schools contributed at least one response and we had a total of 2641 respondents.
Due to two large single sex secondary schools contributing considerably larger number of respondents to the respondent pool than other schools, we excluded some responses from these schools to avoid skewing the data. For these schools, we trimmed responses where students didnât finish the survey and of those remaining, we removed a random sample of students to reduce each schoolâs contribution to no more than 9 percent of the total sample. This resulted in our sample reducing to 1893 respondents. We, however, did use one of the schoolâs full data for a case study within the report, so the removed responses still contributed to the overall report.
A full list of survey questions we asked parents can be found in Appendix 3.
Below is the breakdown of student participants:
Demographic |
Number |
Percentage |
Population percentages |
MÄori |
420 |
22% |
25% |
Non-MÄori |
1473 |
78% |
75% |
Pacific |
284 |
15% |
10% |
Non-Pacific |
1609 |
85% |
90% |
Female |
1018 |
54% |
49% |
Male |
797 |
42% |
51% |
Gender diverse/other |
52 |
3% |
Not reported |
Year 4 |
18 |
1% |
10% |
Year 5 |
329 |
17% |
10% |
Year 6 |
290 |
15% |
10% |
Year 7 |
204 |
11% |
12% |
Year 8 |
219 |
12% |
11% |
Year 9 |
174 |
9% |
10% |
Year 10 |
212 |
11% |
10% |
Year 11 |
184 |
10% |
9% |
Year 12 |
137 |
7% |
9% |
Year 13 |
126 |
7% |
8% |
Disabled |
158 |
8% |
Not reported |
Non- disabled |
1497 |
79% |
Not reported |
Decile 1-3 |
450 |
24% |
22% |
Decile 4-7 |
773 |
41% |
38% |
Decile 8-10 |
668 |
35% |
38% |
Population figures calculated from 2021 roll data and percentages are of all learners. Year level percentages are calculated as a percentage of learners in Years 4-13 only, to be consistent with the sample for the survey
ERO conducted the parent survey with the help of a survey panel recruitment company. We had a total of 1133 parents participate. The survey was in the field from 12 July 2022 to 5 August 2022. This spanned both the school holidays (9 July to 24 July) and term time (25 July onwards). The sample was as nationally representative as practical with both MÄori and Pacific parents slightly boosted in the sample. As some parents had multiple children, we got all parents to select the age(s) of the child(ren). If they had more than one school aged child, one age was selected at random and the parents were informed to answer the survey from then on in relation to âtheir Year XX child.â
A full list of survey questions we asked parents can be found in Appendix 3.
Below is a breakdown of the parent participants:
Demographic |
Number |
Percentage |
MÄori (parent) |
273 |
24% |
Non-MÄori (parent) |
860 |
76% |
Pacific (parent) |
92 |
8% |
Non-Pacific (parent) |
1041 |
92% |
Female (parent) |
675 |
60% |
Male (parent) |
451 |
40% |
Gender diverse/other (parent) |
3 |
>1% |
Year 4 (child) |
121 |
11% |
Year 5 (child) |
117 |
10% |
Year 6 (child) |
116 |
10% |
Year 7 (child) |
118 |
10% |
Year 8 (child) |
114 |
10% |
Year 9 (child) |
115 |
10% |
Year 10 (child) |
109 |
10% |
Year 11 (child) |
108 |
10% |
Year 12 (child) |
111 |
10% |
Year 13 (child) |
104 |
9% |
Disabled (child) |
134 |
12% |
Non-disabled (child) |
946 |
83% |
Decile 1-3 |
236 |
22% |
Decile 4-7 |
444 |
41% |
Decile 8-10 |
402 |
37% |
Female (child) |
508 |
45% |
Male (child) |
595 |
53% |
Gender diverse/other (child) |
9 |
1% |
We conducted six parent focus groups with 37 participants in total. These were all held online. We recruited a nationally representative sample through a panel company which included a mix of male and females, parents of different aged children and from a geographical spread. We also ensured we had a range of ethnic representation and boosted MÄori and Pacific participants. MÄori and Pacific ERO staff conducted specific focus groups with just MÄori and Pacific parents respectively. Focus groups were conducted between 20 July 2022 and 9 August 2022.
The questions we asked parents are set out below:
The focus groups were recorded, and extensive notes were taken. The notes were coded for key themes, and quotes were gathered from records.
ERO conducted 10 focus groups across five schools which included approximately 80 learners. These were all held in person. We included a mixture of male and female participants and covered both primary and secondary schools. We also intentionally included schools of a range of deciles and geographical locations within New Zealand and ensured we had a spread of ethnicities. We also conducted a specific focus group with a high proportion of MÄori students which was led by experienced ERO MÄori review staff. We conducted the focus groups between the 28 July 2022 and 16 August 2022. The questions we asked learners are set out below:
Learners were asked in groups to discuss the questions, and their answers were written up on large flipcharts in their own words. The learner focus groups were not recorded or transcribed.Â
ERO talked to 41 teachers and school leaders from 33 schools through both focus groups and interviews. These were held both in person and on the phone. We conducted these between 20 July 2022 and 25 August 2022. We talked to a broadly representative sample of schools, and intentionally covered schools from a range of geographical locations and deciles.
The questions we asked leaders were:
The questions we asked teachers were:
The focus groups were conducted with extensive notes taken. The notes were coded for key themes, and quotes were gathered from verbatim records.
As the findings from the teacher and school interviews and focus groups were consistent with the parent and learner surveys and interviews, this report focusses largely on the findings from parents and learners, and includes teachersâ and school perspective to aid understanding. Teacher and school ideas were drawn on to identify good practice and strategies that could help with attendance.
As with all research, there are some limitations to our methodology.
Learner survey:Â Schools were able to choose the learners they passed the survey on to, and it is possible that learners who completed the survey were more likely to have regular attendance than the population. We checked this by comparing the reported regular non-attendance rate of learners in our sample with national figures. The non-attendance rate of learners in low decile school was lower than national figures.
Our parent survey and focus group samples were recruited from nationally representative panels. We bolstered our parent survey and focus groups to ensure sufficient sample from low incomes, MÄori and Pacific parents. However, recruiting parents through the panel companies does limit our sample to only those who were signed up to such companies.
Our data collection occurred during the peak of the Omicron outbreak. As our findings show, sickness was a big barrier to attendance so collecting data at a time of high sickness would have influenced some of our results especially the self-reported attendance rates of students or their parents for Term 2.
MÄori learners are a key focus of this research (as set out in Part 6) and were made up 22 percent of survey respondents (compared to 25 percent of student population). MÄori researchers facilitated a MÄori whÄnau focus group and facilitated a MÄori learners focus group. We ran a sense making session with MÄori staff within ERO, using Ka Hikitia as a framework for discussion. This research is undertaken within English Medium schools, although Ministry of Education data includes MÄori medium. Looking at attendance in MÄori medium schools would need to be developed with MÄori medium schools taking a Kaupapa MÄori approach.
ERO used a mixed method approach of surveys, focus groups and interviews. This report draws on student, parent, and school voices to understand the reason why students miss or go to school.
ERO used a mixed method approach for the data collection for this report. We collected both qualitative and quantitative data. The target population were English medium schools in New Zealand. Data was collected through surveys and focus groups, of students and parents, and interviews with teachers and school leaders.
Quantitative data were statistically analysed using STATA and Excel software. Meaningful differences between groups were identified by the magnitude of differences in percentages between groups. We looked for differences where: there was a greater than seven percentage points differences, where one group responded to a question at twice the rate of another group (for lower percentages) or where a difference meaningfully explained a particular factor. Non-responses and âdonât knowâ responses were excluded from response totals when calculating percentages.
Qualitative data were thematically analysed by an experienced team.
ERO conducted the student survey using Survey Monkey. The student survey was in the field from 23rd of June 2022 to 18th of August 2022 (spanning parts of both term 2 and term 3). We invited a random sample of 400 schools to participate in our survey, excluding schools that ERO had recently contacted for other surveys. Schools were sent the survey link in an email and invited to pass this on to their students. 48 schools contributed at least one response and we had a total of 2641 respondents.
Due to two large single sex secondary schools contributing considerably larger number of respondents to the respondent pool than other schools, we excluded some responses from these schools to avoid skewing the data. For these schools, we trimmed responses where students didnât finish the survey and of those remaining, we removed a random sample of students to reduce each schoolâs contribution to no more than 9 percent of the total sample. This resulted in our sample reducing to 1893 respondents. We, however, did use one of the schoolâs full data for a case study within the report, so the removed responses still contributed to the overall report.
A full list of survey questions we asked parents can be found in Appendix 3.
Below is the breakdown of student participants:
Demographic |
Number |
Percentage |
Population percentages |
MÄori |
420 |
22% |
25% |
Non-MÄori |
1473 |
78% |
75% |
Pacific |
284 |
15% |
10% |
Non-Pacific |
1609 |
85% |
90% |
Female |
1018 |
54% |
49% |
Male |
797 |
42% |
51% |
Gender diverse/other |
52 |
3% |
Not reported |
Year 4 |
18 |
1% |
10% |
Year 5 |
329 |
17% |
10% |
Year 6 |
290 |
15% |
10% |
Year 7 |
204 |
11% |
12% |
Year 8 |
219 |
12% |
11% |
Year 9 |
174 |
9% |
10% |
Year 10 |
212 |
11% |
10% |
Year 11 |
184 |
10% |
9% |
Year 12 |
137 |
7% |
9% |
Year 13 |
126 |
7% |
8% |
Disabled |
158 |
8% |
Not reported |
Non- disabled |
1497 |
79% |
Not reported |
Decile 1-3 |
450 |
24% |
22% |
Decile 4-7 |
773 |
41% |
38% |
Decile 8-10 |
668 |
35% |
38% |
Population figures calculated from 2021 roll data and percentages are of all learners. Year level percentages are calculated as a percentage of learners in Years 4-13 only, to be consistent with the sample for the survey
ERO conducted the parent survey with the help of a survey panel recruitment company. We had a total of 1133 parents participate. The survey was in the field from 12 July 2022 to 5 August 2022. This spanned both the school holidays (9 July to 24 July) and term time (25 July onwards). The sample was as nationally representative as practical with both MÄori and Pacific parents slightly boosted in the sample. As some parents had multiple children, we got all parents to select the age(s) of the child(ren). If they had more than one school aged child, one age was selected at random and the parents were informed to answer the survey from then on in relation to âtheir Year XX child.â
A full list of survey questions we asked parents can be found in Appendix 3.
Below is a breakdown of the parent participants:
Demographic |
Number |
Percentage |
MÄori (parent) |
273 |
24% |
Non-MÄori (parent) |
860 |
76% |
Pacific (parent) |
92 |
8% |
Non-Pacific (parent) |
1041 |
92% |
Female (parent) |
675 |
60% |
Male (parent) |
451 |
40% |
Gender diverse/other (parent) |
3 |
>1% |
Year 4 (child) |
121 |
11% |
Year 5 (child) |
117 |
10% |
Year 6 (child) |
116 |
10% |
Year 7 (child) |
118 |
10% |
Year 8 (child) |
114 |
10% |
Year 9 (child) |
115 |
10% |
Year 10 (child) |
109 |
10% |
Year 11 (child) |
108 |
10% |
Year 12 (child) |
111 |
10% |
Year 13 (child) |
104 |
9% |
Disabled (child) |
134 |
12% |
Non-disabled (child) |
946 |
83% |
Decile 1-3 |
236 |
22% |
Decile 4-7 |
444 |
41% |
Decile 8-10 |
402 |
37% |
Female (child) |
508 |
45% |
Male (child) |
595 |
53% |
Gender diverse/other (child) |
9 |
1% |
We conducted six parent focus groups with 37 participants in total. These were all held online. We recruited a nationally representative sample through a panel company which included a mix of male and females, parents of different aged children and from a geographical spread. We also ensured we had a range of ethnic representation and boosted MÄori and Pacific participants. MÄori and Pacific ERO staff conducted specific focus groups with just MÄori and Pacific parents respectively. Focus groups were conducted between 20 July 2022 and 9 August 2022.
The questions we asked parents are set out below:
The focus groups were recorded, and extensive notes were taken. The notes were coded for key themes, and quotes were gathered from records.
ERO conducted 10 focus groups across five schools which included approximately 80 learners. These were all held in person. We included a mixture of male and female participants and covered both primary and secondary schools. We also intentionally included schools of a range of deciles and geographical locations within New Zealand and ensured we had a spread of ethnicities. We also conducted a specific focus group with a high proportion of MÄori students which was led by experienced ERO MÄori review staff. We conducted the focus groups between the 28 July 2022 and 16 August 2022. The questions we asked learners are set out below:
Learners were asked in groups to discuss the questions, and their answers were written up on large flipcharts in their own words. The learner focus groups were not recorded or transcribed.Â
ERO talked to 41 teachers and school leaders from 33 schools through both focus groups and interviews. These were held both in person and on the phone. We conducted these between 20 July 2022 and 25 August 2022. We talked to a broadly representative sample of schools, and intentionally covered schools from a range of geographical locations and deciles.
The questions we asked leaders were:
The questions we asked teachers were:
The focus groups were conducted with extensive notes taken. The notes were coded for key themes, and quotes were gathered from verbatim records.
As the findings from the teacher and school interviews and focus groups were consistent with the parent and learner surveys and interviews, this report focusses largely on the findings from parents and learners, and includes teachersâ and school perspective to aid understanding. Teacher and school ideas were drawn on to identify good practice and strategies that could help with attendance.
As with all research, there are some limitations to our methodology.
Learner survey:Â Schools were able to choose the learners they passed the survey on to, and it is possible that learners who completed the survey were more likely to have regular attendance than the population. We checked this by comparing the reported regular non-attendance rate of learners in our sample with national figures. The non-attendance rate of learners in low decile school was lower than national figures.
Our parent survey and focus group samples were recruited from nationally representative panels. We bolstered our parent survey and focus groups to ensure sufficient sample from low incomes, MÄori and Pacific parents. However, recruiting parents through the panel companies does limit our sample to only those who were signed up to such companies.
Our data collection occurred during the peak of the Omicron outbreak. As our findings show, sickness was a big barrier to attendance so collecting data at a time of high sickness would have influenced some of our results especially the self-reported attendance rates of students or their parents for Term 2.
MÄori learners are a key focus of this research (as set out in Part 6) and were made up 22 percent of survey respondents (compared to 25 percent of student population). MÄori researchers facilitated a MÄori whÄnau focus group and facilitated a MÄori learners focus group. We ran a sense making session with MÄori staff within ERO, using Ka Hikitia as a framework for discussion. This research is undertaken within English Medium schools, although Ministry of Education data includes MÄori medium. Looking at attendance in MÄori medium schools would need to be developed with MÄori medium schools taking a Kaupapa MÄori approach.
For these questions respondents could select from: Strongly agree, Agree, Somewhat agree, Somewhat disagree, Disagree, Strongly disagree, Don't know
For these questions respondents could select from: Strongly agree, Agree, Somewhat agree, Somewhat disagree, Disagree, Strongly disagree, Don't know
Parents selected the age(s) of the child(ren). If they had more than one school-aged child, one age was selected at random and the parents were informed to answer the survey in relation to âtheir Year XX child.â
For these questions respondents could select from: Very important, Important, Somewhat important, Not that important, Not at all important, I donât know.
There are many reasons parents think going to school is important for their child, how important are the following reasons for you?
For these questions respondents could select from: Very likely, Likely, Somewhat likely, Somewhat unlikely, Unlikely, Very unlikely, Donât know.
How likely would you be to keep your Year XX child out of school ifâŚÂ
Keeping in mind there are normally 8-10 weeks (about 50 days) in a school termâŚ
Again please note, there are normally 8-10 weeks (about 50 days) in a school termâŚ
Parents selected the age(s) of the child(ren). If they had more than one school-aged child, one age was selected at random and the parents were informed to answer the survey in relation to âtheir Year XX child.â
For these questions respondents could select from: Very important, Important, Somewhat important, Not that important, Not at all important, I donât know.
There are many reasons parents think going to school is important for their child, how important are the following reasons for you?
For these questions respondents could select from: Very likely, Likely, Somewhat likely, Somewhat unlikely, Unlikely, Very unlikely, Donât know.
How likely would you be to keep your Year XX child out of school ifâŚÂ
Keeping in mind there are normally 8-10 weeks (about 50 days) in a school termâŚ
Again please note, there are normally 8-10 weeks (about 50 days) in a school termâŚ
Research shows that cross sector and community collaboration, partnerships with parents and whÄnau, effective use of attendance data and multiple, tailored school strategies are needed to foster a positive attendance culture across communities and schools and to address non-attendance.Â
Successful strategies often involve multifaceted programmes rather than single isolated practices and involve coordinated efforts across multiple service providers and partnerships with families.Â
Non-attendance can not to be solved by schools alone. Collaboration across Government departments and agencies and with local community groups and providers is needed to reduce the barriers that families and students experience to attending school (such as health, housing, transport, employment). Collaboration ensures that relevant supports and services are delivered to those who need it in a timely way. Â
Building parent and whÄnau awareness of the importance of regular attendance and involving them in strategies to reduce non-attendance is critical to improving attendance.61,62Â This is particularly important for primary-aged children whose attendance patterns are more likely to be parent-driven. Useful evidence-based approaches include: making home visits to families of chronically absent students; establishing a contact person at school for parents to work with; conducting workshops for families on attendance; referring students to support services and using an attendance officer to work with students and families on a consistent basis.63
Research64,65,66Â emphasises the importance of having âactionableâ attendance data to guide decision-making about specific, appropriate strategies to address non-attendance. Robust monitoring of attendance data is linked to early identification of risk factors for non-attendance. Early intervention has been found to be six times more effective than dealing with established non-attendance patterns.67Â In addition, careful monitoring of attendance data helps the sector and schools to better understand the characteristics of students who are not attending, the underlying causes of non-attendance and how best to intervene.68
At a school level the research advocates having both prevention and intervention strategies.69Â Universal prevention programmes involve building positive social and academic school cultures that foster and sustain attendance. Evidence-based practices include: effective classroom management; setting motivating learning goals; having clear standards and high expectations for attendance; increasing family engagement with the school; promoting positive relationships between teachers and students; promoting connectedness and belonging; implementing an anti-bullying plan; and ensuring cultural safety.
Early intervention and intensive intervention strategies are targeted at groups (mild to moderate non-attendance) and individuals (chronic non-attendance) and the underlying reasons for their non-attendance. Evidence-based practices include: social and emotional skills training; family support, incentives programmes; food-in-school; transport support, mentoring and psycho-social support.
Research shows that cross sector and community collaboration, partnerships with parents and whÄnau, effective use of attendance data and multiple, tailored school strategies are needed to foster a positive attendance culture across communities and schools and to address non-attendance.Â
Successful strategies often involve multifaceted programmes rather than single isolated practices and involve coordinated efforts across multiple service providers and partnerships with families.Â
Non-attendance can not to be solved by schools alone. Collaboration across Government departments and agencies and with local community groups and providers is needed to reduce the barriers that families and students experience to attending school (such as health, housing, transport, employment). Collaboration ensures that relevant supports and services are delivered to those who need it in a timely way. Â
Building parent and whÄnau awareness of the importance of regular attendance and involving them in strategies to reduce non-attendance is critical to improving attendance.61,62Â This is particularly important for primary-aged children whose attendance patterns are more likely to be parent-driven. Useful evidence-based approaches include: making home visits to families of chronically absent students; establishing a contact person at school for parents to work with; conducting workshops for families on attendance; referring students to support services and using an attendance officer to work with students and families on a consistent basis.63
Research64,65,66Â emphasises the importance of having âactionableâ attendance data to guide decision-making about specific, appropriate strategies to address non-attendance. Robust monitoring of attendance data is linked to early identification of risk factors for non-attendance. Early intervention has been found to be six times more effective than dealing with established non-attendance patterns.67Â In addition, careful monitoring of attendance data helps the sector and schools to better understand the characteristics of students who are not attending, the underlying causes of non-attendance and how best to intervene.68
At a school level the research advocates having both prevention and intervention strategies.69Â Universal prevention programmes involve building positive social and academic school cultures that foster and sustain attendance. Evidence-based practices include: effective classroom management; setting motivating learning goals; having clear standards and high expectations for attendance; increasing family engagement with the school; promoting positive relationships between teachers and students; promoting connectedness and belonging; implementing an anti-bullying plan; and ensuring cultural safety.
Early intervention and intensive intervention strategies are targeted at groups (mild to moderate non-attendance) and individuals (chronic non-attendance) and the underlying reasons for their non-attendance. Evidence-based practices include: social and emotional skills training; family support, incentives programmes; food-in-school; transport support, mentoring and psycho-social support.