What is it?

Homework refers to tasks given to students by their teachers to be completed outside of usual lessons.

Homework activities vary significantly, particularly between younger and older students, including but not limited to home reading activities, longer projects or essays and more directed and focused work such as revision for tests. 

Our definition also includes activities such as ‘homework clubs’ where students have the opportunity to complete homework in school but outside normal school hours, and ‘flipped learning’ models, where students prepare at home for classroom discussion and application tasks. 

Key Findings

1. Homework has a positive impact on average (+ 5 months), particularly with students in secondary schools.

2. Some students may not have a quiet space for home learning – it is important for schools to consider how home learning can be supported (e.g. through providing homework clubs for students).

3. Homework that is linked to classroom work tends to be more effective. In particular, studies that included feedback on homework had higher impacts on learning.

4. It is important to make the purpose of homework clear to students (e.g. to increase a specific area of knowledge, or to develop fluency in a particular area).

How effective is the approach?

The average impact of homework is positive across both primary and secondary school. There is, however variation behind this average with homework set in primary school having a smaller impact on average (see below).

The quality of the task set appears to be more important than the quantity of work required from the student. There is some evidence that the impact of homework diminishes as the amount of time students spend on it increases. The studies reviewed with the highest impacts set homework twice a week in a particular subject.

Evidence also suggests that how homework relates to learning during normal school time is important. In the most effective examples homework was an integral part of learning, rather than an add-on. To maximise impact, it also appears to be important that students are provided with high quality feedback on their work (see Feedback).

Studies from Aotearoa New Zealand have linked useful homework tasks with positive parental involvement in student learning, and emphasised the importance of teacher capability in providing homework tasks that are tailored and appropriate for diverse students.

Behind the average

Studies in secondary schools show greater impact (+5 months) than in primary schools (+3 months).

Similar positive effects are found for reading, mathematics and science.

Most homework set is individual, studies involving collaboration with peers have higher effects (+6 months), though the number of studies is small.

Studies involving digital technology typically have greater impact (+ 6 months).

Applications and approaches

Homework in primary schools

+ 3

Common homework activities noted in primary schools studies tend to be reading or practising spelling and number facts, but may also include more extended activities to develop inquiry skills or more directed and focused work such as revision for tests.

Setting homework in primary schools has a lower impact on average and has been studied far less than setting homework in secondary schools. Many of the same principles are likely to apply in a primary setting, such as carefully linking homework to classwork and considering the optimal amount of homework – which is likely to be less with younger students.

Homework in secondary schools

+ 5

Common homework activities noted in secondary school studies include completing tasks assigned in lessons, preparing for tasks in future lessons, routine coursework, and revision for tests and examinations.

Setting homework in secondary schools has been studied much more than in primary school and has a positive impact on average.

How could you implement in your setting?

Homework has an impact by enabling students to undertake independent learning to practice and consolidate skills, conduct in-depth inquiry, prepare for lessons or revise for exams. When implementing homework, the evidence suggests a wide variation in impact. Therefore, schools should consider the ‘active’ ingredients to the approach, which may include:

  • Considering the quality of homework over the quantity.
  • Using well-designed tasks that are linked to classroom learning.
  • Clearly setting out the aims of homework to student
  • Understanding and addressing any barriers to completion, such as access to a learning device or resources.
  • Explicitly teaching independent learning strategies.
  • Providing high-quality feedback to improve student
  • Monitoring the impact homework on student engagement, progress and achievement.

Teachers should seek to understand any barriers to completing homework - for example, a lack of access to a quiet space or learning materials - and aim to avoid approaches that use homework as a penalty for poor performance.

What does it cost?

The average cost of homework is expected to be very low with the cost to schools largely based on teacher training and resources. Implementing homework will also require a small amount of staff time for planning and feedback.

Alongside time and cost, school leaders should consider how to maximise the effectiveness of homework through teacher professional development to promote the use of well-designed tasks to complement learning in the classroom and high-quality feedback to improve student learning. Schools should monitor the impact of different approaches to homework – such as the frequency, purpose and variety of tasks - on student engagement and achievement.

How secure is the evidence?

The security of the evidence around homework is rated as low. 43 studies were identified that meet the inclusion criteria of the Toolkit. The topic lost additional padlocks because:

  • A large percentage of the studies are not randomised controlled trials. While other study designs still give important information about effectiveness of approaches, there is a risk that results are influenced by unknown factors that are not part of the intervention.
  • A large percentage of the studies were not independently evaluated. Evaluations conducted by organisations connected with the approach – for example, commercial providers, typically have larger impacts, which may influence the overall impact of the strand.

As with any evidence review, the Toolkit summarises the average impact of approaches when researched in academic studies. It is important to consider your context and apply your professional judgement when implementing an approach in your setting.

Evidence strength
This rating provides an overall estimate of the robustness of the evidence, to help support professional decision-making in schools.
Number of studies

43

Review last updated

August 2021

Local research:

Alton-Lee, A. (2003) Quality teaching for diverse students in schooling: Best evidence synthesis iteration (BES).

Iglis, S. (2005). A two-way street: Homework in a social context.

Gledhill, A. (2015). Homework and continued learning at home: How should parents be involved? Journal of Initial Teacher Inquiry (1) 65-67.

Anthony, G., & Knight, G. (1999). Teaching for understanding and memory in Year 4 and 5 mathematics. A report prepared for the Ministry of Education. Massey University: Institute of Fundamental Sciences.